My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03190
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:54:04 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:58:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2.1 Exempt all flags from the definition of signs, consequently allowing any flag, with any <br />"non-commercial" message, to be displayed on any property within the City <br /> <br />2.2 Allow, in addition to other signage, the display of any number of flags. If a flag <br />contains any commercial message that meets the definition of a business sign <br />advertising a product or service sold on the site, the commercial signage on the flag <br />would be counted as a portion of the permitted on-site commercial signage and be limited <br />to the amount of signage allowed on a site. <br /> <br />3.0 BACKGROUND on ADMINISTRATION REQUEST <br /> <br />3.1 The City Code provides clear direction with regard to the application process, review <br />procedures and appeal procedures, when variance, conditional use permit, and <br />subdivision approvals are involved. But the City Code is not sufficiently clear when <br />other types of permits or staff administrative determinatilons are involved. Most notably <br />is the city's recent experience with sigl1 permitting and code interpretations. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The Zoning Committee reviewed these options on March 1,2000 and AprilS, 2000, and <br />after lengthy discussion, agreed that option 2.4 was the most workable alternative to the <br />current Code. <br /> <br />The City Attorney has provided an updated ordinance (attached) which describes the new <br />definitions as per 2.1 and 2.2 above, as well as creating a formal appeal process. <br /> <br />Report by: Dennis Welsch (651-490-2232) <br /> <br />Attachments: Original Ordinance, Zoning Committee Notes <br /> <br />\\Victoria\CommDev\Planning Files\3190_Sign Ord tlag\RPCA (041200).doc <br /> <br />Planning File #3190 (Sign Ordinance - Flag) 04/12/00 2 <br /> <br />-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.