My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03192
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:54:24 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:58:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />..., <br /> <br />'~ <br /> <br />January 21,2000 <br /> <br />The Honorable John Kysylyczyn <br />Mayor <br />Ci ty of Roseville <br />3083 Victoria Street North <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />~\~ <br />\~ ~ <br /> <br />RE: Bradley Operating Partnership request for <br />vacation of a portion of certain utility and <br />drainage easement" at Har Mar Mal] (PF 3] 83) <br /> <br />Dear NIL Kysylyczyn: <br /> <br />\Xle are writing concerning the present over development at Har Ivlar Mall and the propmed additional <br />development to the site. As long-time Roseville residenrs, we have seen changes that are not always in the best <br />illterest of the residents in the community. The proposed expansion to Har Ivlar Mall is one of those negative <br />changes. <br /> <br />When ordinances are written and passed, they are meant to keep the best inrf:rest of the conmmniLY in mind for <br />the present and future. In looking at the current over development (2596+) ofHar Mar NIall we view thL.., as a <br />negative effect on the community for two important reasons. First, the cap of 25'?6 development is meant to J <br />keep congestion at an acceptable level thereby keeping pedestrians safe, What is presently obvious LO the area in <br />-question is the heavy congestion and that it is not pedestrian fi'iendly due to the congestion. All the casual <br />observer has to do is visit the site on a holiday or any weekend and see for themselves. PedestIian traffic is 110t <br />welcomed or accepted in the area by the vast number of vehides using the surrounding roads (two deaths on <br />Snelling will attest to this). <br /> <br />We are asking that there be no further development to the Har Mar site. I know that city staff has mentioned <br />that they are "just a little" over developed. There is no such thing. That is aboUl a.s logical as saying someone is <br />"just a little" intoxicated. Limits are set for reasons, To allow more development on a site that has already <br />reached it" "carrying capacity" is at the very 1east irresponsiblt.;. Sne]]ing and University is the most po]]uted <br />intersection in the state, I do not want to see Roseville on the map 1~)[ the second most polluted intt:fsection. <br />We already have unwelcome notoriety with Snelling and County Rd. Band SnelJing and County Rd. (~ as the <br />most dangerous. Do not fragment our community any further with additional pedestrian deaths and congestion. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />\U~ ~ ~ cl(!...u..u~ <br /> <br />\~rard & Cindy Schwie <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.