Laserfiche WebLink
<br />occupiable commercial retail and/or service, office, and/or multi-family residential area <br />within a building, but specifically excluding parking ramps and decks. <br /> <br />5.4 Allow the height of a shopping center or outlot buildings to vary based on FAR and its <br />horizontal separation from residential districts with 2 stories allowed for any building less <br />than 100 feet from property line with the maximum height to be 7 stories. Outlot buildings <br />on a shopping center site should have the same setbacks as in a B-3 zone. <br /> <br />5.5 Allow Floor to Area (FAR) ratios of up to 1.0. (Examplel: A building that covers 30% ofa <br />10 acre developable lot area, would be allowed 3.3 acres of building coverage or 143,750 s.f <br />upon which (based on a FAR of 1.0) 435,600 total s.f. of building could be built, which <br />would create a 2 t03 story building. Example 2: At Rosedale, with 72 acres of developable <br />land area, approximately 3,136,300 s.f. of building could be built, with a maximum of <br />940,900 on each floor, or 3 to 4 stories of building. These examples assume that each site has <br />adequate parking to meet the demands of the uses developed on the site.) <br /> <br />5.6 A Planned Unit Development (PUD) should be required for any master plan or building or <br />site plan expansion that increases by more than 10% over the existing master plan which <br />consists ofthe improvements on the site as of January 1,2000. <br /> <br />6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS - October 2, 2002: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended improvements 5.1 through 5.6 (above) be sent to <br />the Council for further study and discussion, after which the Council could request the <br />Planning Commission to hold hearings on specific topics or clarifications of Code language. <br /> <br />7.0 COUNCIL ACTION - October 21, 2002: <br /> <br />The Council provided direction summarized in Section 1.1 of this report. In general, the <br />Council requested that the Commission begin a series of well publicized meetings with the <br />St. Paul Chamber of Commerce, the affected malls and businesses, and the properties owners <br />within 350 feet surrounding the "SC" Shopping Center Districts. They asked that the topics <br />listed below be "broadly interpretated", without the suggested percentages or numbers.. <br /> <br />7.1 Change the "building coverage" ratio to _% of the developable land area within the <br />shopping center master plan as of January 1, 2000. More detail on the impacts that <br />size of the building has on the impacts in surrounding areas, particularly residential <br />uses. <br />7.2 More detail on how to define "developable lot area" as land upon which construction <br />of structures or paving may occur consistent with the approved existing master plan <br />and excepting all public road, transit, and pedestrian easements, but respecting all <br />required setbacks. <br />7.3 More detail.. .on how to define "building" as gross occupiable commercial retail <br />and/or service, office, and/or multi-family residential area within a building, but <br />specifically excluding parking ramps and decks. <br />7.4 More detail. . . .on how to allow the height of a shopping center or outlot buildings to <br />vary based on FAR and its horizontal separation from residential districts. <br />7.5 More detail on how to change Floor to Area (FAR) ratios of up to_. <br /> <br />5 <br />