Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Tim Prinsen <br />February 17, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />effect on the extraordinary setbacks, buffering, height restriction or 24-hour use <br />restrictions that are in place in the SC District. If there is reluctance to take that <br />measure, the standard should be relaxed. A 50% lot coverage standard, for example, <br />would not be out of line with other city ordinance provisions, particularly when the SC <br />District would still have the 0.5 FAR standard to control density, <br /> <br />I hope this information is helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any <br />questions you may have at this time. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />Dean R. Johnson <br />President <br /> <br />Attach. <br />