My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03193
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:55:46 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:59:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />PRINCIPLE No.9 <br /> <br />Provide meaningful incentives to encourage structured <br />and shared parking to make it more economicaLLy viable. <br /> <br />Source: UU 1997 <br /> <br />CURRENT PRACTICE <br /> <br />Most communities do not specify the type of parking structure to be built (e.g., surface lot or parking <br />garage). The type of parking facility constructed in a given area is a reflection of the cost cf land and <br />construction expenses. In suburban and rural areas where land is relatively inexpensive, surface parking <br />costs much less than a parking garage. However, in highly urban areas, garages may be more economical <br />to build than purchasing additional land. <br /> <br />ITE (1994a) discussed the influence of land cost on parking facility development. Where land is abundant <br />and inexpensive, surface lots are usually built. In areas with higher land costs, multi-deck garages may <br />be more economical per car space than open lots. For sites limited by size or extremely high land prices <br />such as downtown business districts, combination facilities with vertically mixed land uses may be the most <br />feasible. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED PRACTICE <br /> <br />Vertical parking structures can significantly reduce impervious cover by reducing acreage converted for <br />parking. Given the economics of parking lots, however, it is not likely that developers will be willing to <br />build a parking garage when a surface parking Lot wouLd be cheaper. Local governments shouLd consider <br />using incentives to encourage the building of multi-level, underground, and under-the-building parking <br />garages. Incentives for defraying some of the costs of parking structures could come in the form of tax <br />credits; stormwater waivers; or density, floor area, or height bonuses. <br /> <br />One way that developers can eliminate land expenses is by incorporating parking into a multipurpose <br />building. The parking is located above or below a ground floor level of retail establishments, with <br />additional floors containing offices, hotels, or apartments. This reduces the land cost chargeable to <br />parking (ITE, 1994a). Lastly, communities shouLd practice what they preach and use garages where feasibLe <br />in the many parking areas they administer. <br /> <br />PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES ABOUT STRUCTURED PARKING <br /> <br />The strongest impedim-e-nttQ structu-red parking is the high cost associated with construction or parking <br />garages. The construction costs of vertical parking structures are significantly higher than of surface lots. <br />ITE (1994a) pointed out that for a typical site, construction of an above-ground garage may be four times <br />the cost per space in a surface lot. Construction costs for a parking garage can range from $7,500 to <br /> <br />- 79 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.