pf_03194 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

for a variance: Findings: ], The strict enforcement of the existing ordinance would not cause an undue hardship on the applicant. Within the current lot coverage limitations, which have a rational basis in providing additional buffer or separation between intensive land uses and abutting properties, the applicant is still able to put the property to a number of reasonable uses, 2, There is insufficient unique circumstances present to warrant a variance for the proposed use. 3. As submitted and as subsequently modified by the applicant, and in spite of the recently adopted design and performance standards for uses within the Shopping Center Districts, the proposed expanded use would negatively affect the character of the neighborhood due to the proximity of the development to the residential properties abutting the subject parcel; the intensity of the proposed use and orientation of the expansion toward the residential neighborhood; and the traffic generated by the proposed expansion. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that the application to issue a Variance to allow the construction of an additional 18,508 square feet of grocery retail, enclosed delivery, and enclosed trash area at the Har Mar Mall is hereby denied. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted on the 10th day of April, 2000.