pf_03194 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Page 7 of8 Mr. Aulk expressed concern for one versus two years of use, No further public comment was offered, The hearing was closed, Member Mulder asked if Ramsey County could be prohibited from bringing material from other sites and 1-15 day period per year (yes). Member Olson asked if Ramsey County could respond to the staff report and conditions (yes). Motion: Member Wilke moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of the Ramsey County and City of Roseville request for an Interim Use Permit to allow a concrete recycling operation on Ramsey County's Kent Street Yard, as per sections 4.4, 4,5, 4.6 of the staff report dated March 8, 2000, and further, that no other material from other sites in the County would be brought to the Kent Street site for stockpiling or crushing. Motion: Member Egli moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to amend the motion by including conditions 5 and 6 from the February 3, 2000 letter from Daniel Soler, Ramsey County: 5) The City will provide to the County a mailing list which will be used for notification of these operations, The County shall notify those on the list at least five days prior to when each operation commences; 6) The County will take periodic noise measurements during each operation and during other times as deemed necessary by the County or as requested by the City, Ayes: 6 Nays: 1 (Olson) Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Rhody, to request the County to provide the City with addresses for notification to residents in St. Paul to a radius of 1500 feet from the crushing site, Ayes: 6 Nays: 1 (Olson) Member Olson stated her concern was that the County was not present, whether it can be done in two years and whether the County can use all the material at the site, Motion, adopted as amended, Ayes: 6 Nays: 1 (Olson) 6d. Planning File 3190. A request by the City of Roseville to amend Section 1009 (Sign Regulations) and 1014 (Administration) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance, Chair Klausing opened the continued hearing, Joel Jamnik explained the issues related to the proposed flag and sign code. The Zoning Committee consensus was that commercial messages on flags would be counted as part of the allowable signage per lot, whereas flags with non-commercial messages would not be counted. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to continue the hearing to April 12, 2000 meeting, Ayes:? http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/counciVplanning/minutes/pm000308.htm 6/20/00