Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH FINDINGS <br /> <br />4.1 Staff recommends approval and suggests the Commission use an outline ofthe following <br />possible findings to determine whether there is an "undue hardship" significant enough to <br />recommend approval of a variance by the City Council. <br /> <br />a. The hardship situation was not (was) created by the applicant (Youngquist) or <br />existed prior to the applicant... <br /> <br />b, The unique physical features or situations within the proposal that could justify a <br />variance include ... <br /> <br />c. The economic issues that may (in part) justify a variance include... <br /> <br />d. The alternative designs that allow use of the site but do not require a variance <br />include.. . <br /> <br />e. The impacts of the project, if the variance was issued, would (would not) create <br />significant community impacts on the health, safety, or general welfare <br />including.. . <br /> <br />f. Other findings deemed appropriate by the Planing Commission... <br /> <br />5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />By motion, and with findings, recommend approval (or denial) of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Attachments: Property location map; aerial photo; site plan; house plan; and narrative. <br />60-day Time Limit: Application accepted on April 28, 2000; Decision deadline is June 26, 2000. <br />Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) <br /> <br />Q:\Planning Files\321 0_ Y oungquist,Steve\RPCA (051 OOO).doc <br /> <br />PF3210 - RPCA (051000) Page 3 of 3 <br />