Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.4 Under current policy the City would not require Mr. McCann to comply with the 30 <br />setback. The City would allow the driveway to remain until such time as it were <br />proposed for reconstruction or the roadway (as in this case) was to be reconstructed. <br /> <br />3.5 Requiring the driveway access point to be adjusted in any capacity would require <br />unnecessary modifications to the existing driveway as it extends from the street to the <br />garage. <br /> <br />3.6 The proposed variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare, provided standards/conditions are attached to insure that redevelopment <br />of the site is completed in accordance with the plans proposed by the applicant. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 of this report, staff <br />recommends approval ofthe request for a variance from Section 703.04B(4) of the City <br />Code, to reduce the require driveway setback for property located at 685 Grandview <br />Avenue from 30 feet to 18 feet or a 12 foot variance. <br /> <br />5.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />By motion, recommend to approve (deny) the Charles McCann request for a 12 foot <br />driveway access point (apron) variance based on the findings located in Section 3 (3.3, <br />3.4,3.5 and 3.6)ofthis report. <br /> <br />Attachments: Property location map; site plan indication driveway; and photos of parcel. <br />60-day Time Limit: City initiated application accepted for June 12, 2000 Planning Commission consideration and <br />June 26, 2000 City Council action. <br />Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) <br /> <br />PF3213 - RPCA (061400) Page 2 of2 <br />