Laserfiche WebLink
<br />development, why should the City invest the time, hearings, review and issuance of permits, <br />inspection of the building, and accept (partial?) responsibility for the building, life safety, and land use <br />function. <br /> <br />May 24 from City Attorney: At this time, we are suggesting as a preferred option that MnDOT <br />can choose to follow all of the City's normal procedures and comply with all of the City regulations <br />and requirements, or in the alternative, MnDOT may choose to proceed at their own risk and on <br />their own authority without any review or approvals by the City, but that if they choose the second <br />alternative, the building will be considered to be in violation of the City Codes (both past and <br />present) and that we will so inform any prospective purchaser of the status of the building as <br />necessary and appropriate.. <br /> <br />Public access also may be inadequate for emergency responses and should be updated either by <br />the current owner or the future owner or tenant. <br /> <br />HISTORY OF WATER'S EDGE BUILDING <br />By: Dennis Welsch, dated May, 2000 <br /> <br />ORIGIN ALLY DEVELOPED BY: ZIMMERMAN REALTY <br /> <br />1. July 17, 1972 Rezoning for Zimmerman Realty from R-1 to B-1B with: <br />Special Use Permit <br />Variance for height <br />Easements returned to Zimmerman by State <br /> <br />2. Aug., 1979 Special Use Permit for site plan approval <br />Variance to 300 foot parking distance (by 150 feet) <br />Variance to shoreline setback and parking setback 100 feet (50 feet to <br />Shore). . <br />Approval of shoreline development permit <br />Traffic controls study <br />Final landscape plan dated July 24, 1979 <br />Rice Creek Watershed approval required <br />, - <br /> <br />. 3. Nov.2, 1979 MnDOT states Water's Edge will "not result in any significant <br />increase" in traffic volumes in County Road B-2; "no traffic signal is <br />justified at this time". <br /> <br />4. Sept., 1980 BR W studied traffic at Waters Edge comparing two alternative plans: .. <br />Alt. 1: 8-10 story hotel/restaurant of 184 units and 423 parking <br />spaces <br />Alt. 2: Second 120,000 sJ. building on south side with 600 parking <br />spaces. <br />Peak hour assignment for Alt 2 was 100 entering and 460 exiting the <br />site with 8500 ADT and f85 peak hour trips on B-2 <br />Estima.ted year 2000 B-2 traffic = 10,000 ADT <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Oct.6, 1980 . <br /> <br />SEH c~lculates popding needs; estimates 6.5 acres impervious, 1.7 <br />acres pervious and construction of WEIR <br />. . r . ." I <br />