Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3404258 <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the comer lot setback for this addition is 30 feet from the property line adjacent <br />to Shryer Street, which in this case requires a 20 foot variance from Section 1004.02D4 of the <br />Roseville City Code for both the existing attached garage and the proposed addition; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request <br />on Wednesday, July 12, 2000, and recommended (7-0) approval of the requested variance based on <br />the following findings: <br /> <br />A. There is a physical hardship (site location) in denying the variance to allow an addition <br />to the existing garage, specifically that the applicant will not be able to use the garage for <br />its intended purpose. <br /> <br />B. The applicant did not create the physical hardship. <br /> <br />C. There is a unique (normal and reasonable use) feature to the property that would justify <br />the variance, specifically the proximately of the existing garage to the street. <br /> <br />D. There is not a reasonable alternative design that would not require a variance. <br /> <br />E. Granting the variance would not significantly impact the health, safety or general welfare <br />of the community. <br /> <br />F. Granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, July 24; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council determined the Planning Commission's findings <br />to a true and accurate basis for granting the requested variance. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") ofthe City of <br />Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that a 20 foot variance to Section <br />1 004.02D4 ofthe Roseville City Code, allowing the existing attached garage and a ten foot addition <br />(or garage reconstruction) to be located in the required comer lot setback area for the property <br />located at 2016 Beacon Street (PID # 162923130025) be approved. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kysylyczyn, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Maschka, <br />Mastel, Goedeke, Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />/:j <br />Z <br />