My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03248
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:10:51 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:00:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />JUL 28 '00 09:46 FR PUBLIC SECTOR SERUICE612 310 6137 TO %514902931 <br /> <br />P.04/04 <br /> <br />SETBACK PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> <br />Question 9. <br />We could find no alternative. The way the lots are configured and the way that the original <br />driveway was poured at the top portion, there was not over 5' between the edge of the driveway <br />and the property line (as best as we.can detennine by using the backyard fence as the basis for <br />the property line). In order to have a continuous double driveway, we do not have any option but <br />to follow the existing. The edge of the driveway extension that we are proposing will be 3' from <br />the property line (abutting property at 3024 Pascal St. No.) <br /> <br />Question 10. <br />We meet at least 8 of the 12 site conditions. <br />a. One car garage - this is true. <br />b. HaVing a double driveway improves the liveability of our property and it looks better than <br />having a small portion of grass on our property next to the driveway. <br />d. We did not create the original driveway on top less than the 5' from property line. <br />e. We do retain over 70% of green space of the lot. <br />f. There are no other variance conditions. <br />g. Having a double driveway will improve the aesthetics of the site. <br />h. We will pour the same cement as used currently. <br />1. Most of our neighbors have a double driveway. <br />J. We will have no more vehicles. <br />k. N/ A - no roof <br />1. N/A - no roof <br /> <br />Question 11. <br />We meet all the parameters indicated in question 11. <br /> <br />Question 11. <br />a. Application fee of $25 under separate cover. <br />b. Gaylen and Craig Mills! 3024 Pascal Street North - see previously submitted letter signed by <br />om neighbors indicating their agreement with our proposed driveway extension. <br />c. Site plan previously submitted. <br />d. Narrative: This pennit is needed so that we can <'.ontinue our driveway - which is double at <br />the top half - down to the street level. The resulting impact on the neighborhood is to <br />achieve a more balanced look. Most of the other residences have double driveways. When <br />the city added curbs to our street in 1998. we did obtaina bid to have this work done but we <br />could not afford it at the time. Several other houses did so at this time. We would like to do <br />so now. <br /> <br />** TOTAL PAGE.04 ** <br /> <br />-- "..__11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.