My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03253
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:11:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:00:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />, ... <br /> <br />Plan designation of "B", Business, and is located in Comprehensive Planning District No, 14; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, September 13,2000, and recommended approval (6-0) of the variances <br />being requested based on the following: <br /> <br />Findings: <br /> <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission found that a strict application of the City Code would <br />work an unusual hardship on the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, specifically, that the unique physical feature of the principal structure being <br />located so far west on the parcel that it prevents exit from the car wash without a variance; and <br /> <br />Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or general <br />welfare of the community; and <br />Whereas, the variance is needed to allow sufficient safety turn radius for fuel trucks; and <br /> <br />Whereas, specifically, the unique physical feature of the limited size of the parcel of land <br />prevents the applicant from providing adequate ingress and egress to his business without a <br />variance. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, September 25,2000 and made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The City has determined that the site has unique characteristics, few alternatives, and <br />pre-existing hardships that warrant granting a variance. Further, the conditional use <br />permit meets the necessary criteria to allow the renovation and expansion project <br />because it is properly zoned for auto service in an area where autos are the primarily <br />transportation mode; it can visually enhance the corner and the pre-existing <br />site/structure; and it will provide a more functional fuel/service car wash facility. <br /> <br />2. A strict application of the City Code would impose an unusual hardship on the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />3. The unique physical feature of the principal structure being located so far west on the <br />parcel that it prevents exit from the car wash without a variance, <br /> <br />4. The hardship was not created by the applicant, <br /> <br />5. Granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or general <br />welfare of the community. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.