My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03255
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2007 4:23:32 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:00:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3255
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2985 LEXINGTON AVE N
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/25/2000
Planning Files - Resolution #
9816
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3404266 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation <br />on Monday, September 25, 2000; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1 Section 10116.22A1 (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-conformities can continue but are <br />subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair after <br />damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. <br /> <br />2 Section 1016.26B1 (Storm Water Management) requires all single-family lots within the <br />Shoreland Management District to have no more that 25% impervious site coverage. <br /> <br />3 Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back a minimum of <br />75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHW). <br /> <br />4 Section 1004. 02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and <br />Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet. <br /> <br />5 The property located at 2985 Lexington Avenue is an odd shaped parcel, has topographical <br />challenges such as steep slopes, mature trees and has no reasonable alternative without <br />impacting similar setback requirements. The parcel slopes up from the water's edge south <br />towards Josephine Road, rising 12 to 14 feet to the south property line. <br /> <br />6 Due to the tuck under garage, the site has additional pavement to facilitate the proper <br />movement of vehicles from the garage to Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />7 The proposal to locate the detached garage four feet north of the existing driveway has been <br />approved by the DNR. More specifically, the DNR has concluded that hardship(s) exist on the <br />parcel, limiting Mr. Mickelson's options, and hence, the DNR supports the four variances <br />being requested. <br /> <br />8 A variance requires the applicant to prove physical hardship and to demonstrate that no <br />practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br /> <br />9 The unique parcel configuration is classified as a pre-existing, non-conformity within the <br />Shoreland Ordinance and the location of the property adjacent to Lexington Avenue(a County <br />Road) and Josephine Park, adversely impacts development and/or redevelopment <br />opportunities for the Mickelson's <br /> <br />10 The hardship is not the applicant's creation. <br /> <br />11 The property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions permitted by the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />12 If granted, the variance will not impact the health, safety, or general welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />Ij <br /> <br />:; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.