My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03262
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2007 4:13:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:01:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3262
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2958 WOODBRIDGE ST
Applicant
Bernard Roeller
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 07/28/97 <br />ITEM NO: C-2 <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br />CONSENT <br />Bernard Roeller request for a minor variance for a detached garage <br />at 2958 Woodbridge Street N (PF#2939). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />:tJJ. REQUESTED ACTION <br /> <br />1.1 Bernard Roeller is requesting a minor variance to place an accessory building <br />(detached garage) within the side yard of a parcel at 2958 Woodbridge Street N. <br /> <br />Requirement <br /> <br />Proposal <br /> <br />Variance <br /> <br />Accessory building <br />must be in rear yard <br /> <br />Placement of <br />accessory building <br />in side yard <br /> <br />2Jl BACKGROUND <br /> <br />2.1 Bernard Roeller owns a home at 2958 Woodbridge Street N. The property is zoned <br />R-1 Single Family Residential and adjacent land uses are all single family <br />residential. <br /> <br />2.2 Mr. Roeller is requesting a variance from Section 1004.01A to allow the placement <br />of an accessory building in a location other than the rear yard. The existing one car <br />garage on the property is located in the rear yard on the north side of the parcel; <br />however, there are problems with the narrow width of the driveway and the <br />accumulation of snow in this area. There is also a grade differential in this area and <br />part of the existing driveway is constructed within an access easement across the <br />property to the north. Mr. Roeller is proposing to build a new two car garage and <br />driveway on the south side of the parcel in line with the house, and then remove the <br />existing one car garage and driveway on the north side of the parcel. The area <br />occupied by the existing garage and driveway will be landscaped upon completion <br />of the new garage and removal of the existing garage. A patio area on the <br />southeast comer of the house would have to be removed if the garage were placed <br />in the rear yard on the south side of the parcel. The narrow width of the existing <br />driveway, the difference In grade between this property and the property to <br />the north, and the location of an existing patio area on the south side of the <br />house creates a practical difficulty for the applicants. <br /> <br />PF#2939 - RCA - Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.