My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03266
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2007 10:22:19 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3266
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
382 NORTH MCCARRONS BLVD
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
10/23/2000
Planning Files - Resolution #
9828
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8. The porch slab and the property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the <br />conditions permitted by the ordinance. <br /> <br />9. If granted, the variance will not impact the health, safety, or general welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City <br />ofRoseville (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that the following variances to allow the <br />replacement of a 25 foot by 11.5 foot (307 sq. ft.) four-season porch at the same location on the <br />existing concrete slab at 382 North McCarrons Boulevard (PID # 132923240020) be approved: <br /> <br />Section 1016.22Al (Non-Conformities) allowing a 52 foot variance to the 100 foot wide <br />required lot width for the a per-existing non-conforming 48 foot wide parcel; and <br /> <br />Section 1616.16 (Structure Design Standards) allowing a 42 foot variance to the 75 foot <br />principal structure setback from the ordinary high watermark (OHW) of Lake <br />McCarrons; and <br /> <br />Section 1004.02DS (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-l Districts) allowing a 2.3 foot variance to the 5 foot <br />required principal structure side yard setback; <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Mastel, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mayor <br />Kysylyczyn, Maschka, Mastel, and Wiski; <br />and the following voted against the same: Goedeke <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.