My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03272
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2007 10:17:56 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:01:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3272
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2376 COHANSEY ST
Applicant
Natalija Ericksen
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
11/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3.0 STAFF COMMENT <br /> <br />3.1 Based on State Statutes and the Roseville City Code, variances may be granted where the <br />strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the ordinance would cause "undue <br />hardship". The granting of a variance may only occur when it can be demonstrated that <br />such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />3.2 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight ofthe land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br /> <br />3.3 Conditions may be attached to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adjoining <br />properties. <br /> <br />3.4 The lot at 2376 Cohansey Street is a large lot measuring 115 feet wide and 240 feet deep, <br />encompassing 27,791 square feet; it is more than twice the required new lot size. <br /> <br />3.5 The proposed tool shed/playhouse would be set back at least 11 feet from the north (side <br />yard) property line and 26 feet from east (rear yard) property line. <br /> <br />3.6 Ms. Ericksen had a shed (see City Sight sheet) removed from the rear yard because of its <br />dilapidated condition. The existing detached garage and home are small and do not have <br />adequate storage space to fit a riding mower, snow blower, yard furniture, and other <br />gardening, household and play items. <br /> <br />3.7 There appears to be adequate space (30 feet) between the house and the detached garage. <br />An addition could be added to the detached garage to accommodate needed storage <br />space. However, Ms. Ericksen prefers a shed in the rear yard more centrally located to <br />the garden and the majority of the yard. <br /> <br />3.8 Another alternative could be to add the playhouse to the rear of the existing detached <br />garage and construct a new 120 square foot garden shed in the rear yard. <br /> <br />3.9 Yet another alternative is to construct a new 120 square foot garden shed in the rear yard <br />and, instead of construction permanent play house area, purchase the portable children's <br />play house equipment that can be moved and/or disassembled as the children no longer <br />use the equipment <br /> <br />4.0 POLICY REFERENCE <br /> <br />4.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage <br />reconstruction and upgrading of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout <br />the community. <br /> <br />PF3272 - RPCA (I 10800) Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.