pf_03276 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.10 Section 10 - Community Facilities: The City razed one of its community facilities in the Year 2000, The Arona building was demolished in November 2000 and the City will be considering site redevelopment proposal in 2001, 2.11 Section 11 Implementation Strategies: The City of Roseville continues as a partner in the North Metro 1-35W Corridor Coalition, a collaborative planning process for the 35W that included six other cities, In 2000 the Build-Out Study was completed and adopted by the Coalition Board of Directors in which the Coalition designated Rosedale and Twin Lakes as the one "suburban activity center" within the subregion. The Roseville City Council also approved amendments to Sections, 1002 (Rules & Definitions), 1006 (Shopping Center District), 1007 (Industrial Districts), 1008 (Planned Unit Developments), 1010 (Design Standards Regulations), and 1013 (Conditional Use; Variances, For further information contact the Roseville Community Development Department. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is required by State Statute to be part of the Comprehensive Plan review process in this sense: Annually, the Planning Commission reviews the list of implementation projects (Draft, 2001) and advises the Council whether the projects are consistent with land use provisions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, The Commission also reviews the remainder of the five year CIP as a "guide" and advises the Council on consistency with the Plan or recommends changes in the Plan to create more consistency. The Commission is not charged with the task of reviewing and advising on financial feasibility or budgetary issues. 2,12 Section 12 - Appendices: Comprehensive Plan Appendices, Book 2 continues to be updated to retain implementation programs and other works for each Section. It also contains a summary of the five-year capital improvement program, which is updated annually and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.0 ST AFF RECOMMENDATION 3.1 The Planning Staff recommends affirming these changes and officially including them in the Plan and noting their inclusion in the addenda sheet at the beginning of the plan, an example of which is attached to this report. 4.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission held the required public hearing. There was no public comment at the hearing. By a resolution the Planning Commission reaffirmed the changes made to the Plan during 2000, adopted the outline for placement in the plan, and recommended that the changes be placed within the Comprehensive Plan, and advised that the CIP (Draft,200 1) is consistent with the Plan. The Commission then sent the Plan to the Council for its action. PF 3276 - RCA (01/08/01) - Page 3 of 4