pf_03279 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. WHEREAS, Section 1016.26Bl (Stonn Water Management) requires all single-family lots within the Shoreland Management District to have no more that 25% impervious site coverage. Impervious area includes roof, sidewalk, patio, and driveway areas; and WHEREAS, the lot is 8,716 square feet in size which allows for an impervious area of 2, 179 square feet. The existing home, drive, sidewalk, and detached garage has an impervious area of3,005 square feet or 34.5%. The proposed home, storage building, existing and proposed driveway will have an impervious calculation of3,305 square feet or 38% and requires a variance to allow redevelopment to occur on the parcel; and WHEREAS, Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back a minimum of75 feet from the ordinary high watennark (OHW); and WHEREAS, the proposed home will be setback 49 feet from the Ordinary High Watennark (OHW). This setback is approximately the same as the existing structure (48 feet) and is consistent with adjacent homes and requires a 26 foot variance; and WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the proposal and has indicated support for the redevelopment of the parcel and concluded that the site has hardships that warrant variances; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission, on January 10,2001, conducted a public hearing regarding the request and made the following findings: . 1. The property owner did not create the hardship. The lot division occurred and the structure was constructed and improved many years before the current owner purchased the property. City records indicate the existing structure was constructed in 1934 with sewer, water, foundation and a basement being installed in the early 1960's. The Roseville City Code was adopted in 1959 and the Shoreland Ordinance adopted in 1974. 2. The economics of constructing an addition and remodeling versus constructing new are quite different. The existing structure does not meet most building codes. Remodeling would be costly and difficult. New construction would provide a modem structure that meets all current building codes and the purpose and intent of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. 3. Requiring a setback of75 feet from the OHW would be overly restrictive and out of character with the adjacent homes. The parcel has a sharp (vertical) transition from the road inward creating a unique physical feature that provides difficulties for redevelopment and direct access. Access is currently (will remain) via a private easement with the west property owner. The narrow width of the parcel limits the type, style, and design options for a new home. Adjacent homes are located 38 feet (east) and 60 feet (west) from the OHW suggesting the proposed new home be placed 49 feet (the average of adjacent lots) from the OHW and in a similar line to the lakeshore. e 2