Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br /> <br />Extract of MiD1lU1tes froM JP'naJrnIl1lUlI1lg COMMnSSUOIl1l Meetill1ll:!: of JJ31I11lUar'V n~, ~w~n: <br /> <br />e. JP'lall1lll1lill1l1! ]Fine 323~: A request by Peter Vesterholt, 699 Heinel Circle, for a 5 <br />and 23 foot variance from Section 1004,020 (Minimum Yard Requirements) of <br />the Roseville Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of an attached garage into <br />the required side and front yard (street side) setback. <br /> <br />Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated January 10,2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke provided a description of the garage expansion project. He explained <br />the 10' setback requirements and the MnONR support for granting the variance. <br /> <br />The applicant did not create the hardship; the use is pre-existing; the garage adds <br />livability and accessibility; the setback is similar to other setbacks in the area, Platted in <br />1949, the lot is non-conforming with the house so close to the front property line (15 <br />feet), The street was reconstructed and moved further from the house leaving a large <br />right-of-way boulevard. City Code Section 602 requires parking on private property, not <br />in boulevards without a variance or permit. Staff recommended approval with conditions <br />A through E of the project report dated January 10,2001. <br /> <br />Mr. Vesterholt explained the expansion and the benefit of removing the front storage <br />shed. <br /> <br />No further public comment was offered; the public hearing was closed, <br /> <br />Motion: Member Klausing moved, second by Member Rhody, to recommend approval <br />of Resolution #3280 with amendment to add Section 602 and conditions A through E of <br />said Resolution (an executed copy of which is attached). <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried, <br />