Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 6, 2013 <br />Page 5 <br />Chair Gisselquist opined that, from his perspective, current language allowing administrative <br />195 <br />discretion or requiring waivers, was sufficient. However, Chair Gisselquist stated that he would <br />196 <br />like to make sure the third bullet point (page 2, lines 13-15) with the 50’ requirement was added. <br />197 <br />Mr. Paschke advised that the Commission’s recommendation could be forwarded to the City <br />198 <br />Council accordingly, based on their previous action and tonight’s subsequent discussion and <br />199 <br />clarification. Mr. Paschke reviewed the process for staff moving the third bullet point as previously <br />200 <br />referenced, forward to the City Council as a Text Amendment; with no additional Public Hearing <br />201 <br />required, and probably incorporated with other Text Amendments. <br />202 <br />Member Murphy opined that the third bullet point to him appeared to sufficiently serve as a <br />203 <br />specific triggering mechanism. <br />204 <br />After an ensuing brief discussion, it was Commission consensus that current language provided <br />205 <br />enough flexibility at this time, and if further concerns were received from contractors or <br />206 <br />developers that they had trouble developing in Roseville due to the strictness of its code, such a <br />207 <br />situation would become evident and come before the Commission in the future. <br />208 <br />With no one from the public speaking to this item, Chair Gisselquist ended discussions at <br />209 <br />approximately 7:30p.m. <br />210 <br />Chair Gisselquist confirmed that staff would bring the third bullet point language revision (page 2, <br />211 <br />lines 13-15) before the City Council in the future as a recommended text amendment. <br />212 <br />7. Adjourn <br />213 <br />Chair Gisselquist adjourned at approximately 7:20 p.m. <br />214 <br />