Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 22-3 <br /> <br /> 2004 Level of Service by Development Scenario - PM Peak Hour <br /> With Development With Development With Currently <br />Intersection Approved in 1997 Approved in Proposed <br /> February 2000 Development <br />Veritas Way / B B C <br />Cleveland Ave <br />Co. Rd. C2 / C C C <br />Cleveland Ave <br />Lydia Ave / C C C <br />Cleveland Ave <br />Brenner Ave / C C C <br />Cleveland Ave <br />N. Centre Pointe E E F <br />Dr. / Cleveland Ave <br /> <br />Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Results/) <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Unsignalized intersection results refer to the lowest side street level of service experienced. <br /> <br />A potential measure to mitigate the poor level of service expected at the North <br />Centre Pointe Drive/Cleveland A venue intersection is installation of traffic signal <br />control. The 2004 p.m. peak hour traffic volumes forecasted for the intersection <br />with the current development concept are sufficient to satisfy the minimum <br />volume criteria for the peak hour warrant for traffic signal installation. Traffic <br />volumes at the North Centre Pointe Drive/Cleveland Avenue intersection should <br />be monitored following completion of the Centre Pointe development and traffic <br />signal control should be considered when actual traffic volumes meet the required <br />warrants. <br /> <br />The overall conclusion of the traffic analysis report is that the current proposed <br />Centre Pointe development would not cause any significant negative traffic <br />impacts at the any of the 10 intersections that have been examined. The traffic <br />impacts associated with the current Centre Pointe development proposal are <br />nearly identical to the impacts that would have been experienced with the Centre <br />Pointe development proposals approved in February of2000 and in the spring of <br />1997. <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />Vehicle related air emissions: Provide an estimated of the effect of the <br />project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. <br />Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on <br />air quality impacts. (If project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult <br />"EA W Guidelines" about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) <br /> <br />Page 24 <br />