Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I Extract of Minutes from Planninl! Commission meetinl! of January 10.2001: <br />2 <br />3 f. Planninl! File 3284: A request by Charles Kadrie and A TP Minneapolis, Inc. for a <br />4 conditional use pennit to allow the installation of a wireless telecommunication <br />5 antenna on the roof of the Roseville Professional Center, 2233 North Hamline <br />6 A venue. <br />7 <br />8 Chainnan Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />9 Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated January 10,2001. <br />IO <br />II Thomas Paschke explained the City Code requirements for commercial receiving or <br />12 transmitting antennas. He noted the Roseville Library expressed concern for fear of <br />13 interference (letter of January 9, 2001). <br />14 <br />15 The proposal would add more support for existing antennas operated by VoiceStream <br />16 Wireless. The installation includes equipment cabinets on the roof of the building. Each <br />17 proposed antenna support unit could hold up to four antennas. (Existing antennas are <br />18 attached to the penthouse walls instead of separate antenna structures.) <br />19 <br />20 Thomas Paschke noted the uses do not create or hinder traffic; the units and cabinets can <br />21 be painted to match the existing building color; there appears to be no health, safety, or <br />22 welfare impacts and the use complies with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />23 Staff recommended approval to allow installation of the antenna. <br />24 <br />25 Chair Klausing asked if the "leasing sign" on the penthouse was legal. Staff has worked <br />26 with the owner to reduce the size to meet the Code. <br />27 <br />28 Wendy Metchnek, APT representative, explained that condition #4.1 must be changed or <br />29 removed to be installed on a structure support apparatus placed on the rooftop rather than <br />30 on the north wall of the penthouse. <br />31 <br />32 Chair Klausing asked why the antenna structure could not be set back from the edge of <br />33 the building (the building blocks a part of the reception area). <br />34 <br />35 Member Wilke asked if antennas could be placed on the roof of the penthouse. Chair <br />36 Klausing said he preferred white painted surfaces nearer the existing walls. <br />37 <br />38 Member Cunningham asked for comment from applicants regarding Ramsey County <br />39 Library interference. (The frequency is designated per carrier and should not be a <br />40 problem). <br />41 <br />42 Ms. Metchnek said eventually there would be six (up from four) equipment cabinets on <br />43 the roof. They will not be seen at grade from the property line. All units (30" wide, 40" <br />44 long, 5 feet high) should be painted to match the existing building walls. <br />45 <br />46 Member Cunningham asked if the roof could hold the additional weight. An APT <br />47 structural engineer will design the load to meet roof capacity. <br />48 <br />49 Willard Johnson, 1371 Sandhurst Drive, asked for detailed infonnation. He noted other <br />50 CUPs on this site have created problems. Are there other buildings that could be used? <br />51 The antennas now in place have affected the use of televisions in the adjoining blocks. <br />