Laserfiche WebLink
<br />E. List adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed <br />districts, etc.) to which copies of the plan revision or amendment have been sent, and the date <br />the<:opie.s~e.r.e.u~e.l1ttgJ~e.rt:I~(~~lJi~~~ml:>yt0illn.u'u?~~t: 4 73.858, S u bd. 2). <br />IlnQI$Q1~!I;R~~;ln!.Qf"~I!Yr~!m;$QIEQ~~)Q~~1g~~~ <br /> <br />SECTION II: CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS <br /> <br />A. Transportation <br /> <br />1. Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute <br />of Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? <br />9 No . . if no, Skip to #5. <br />~ Yes. . if yes, <br />· What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? <br /> <br /> <br />· What is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? <br /> <br /> <br />2. Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have <br />the cap~sity to accommodate planned land use(s)? <br />~Yes <br />o No . . if no, briefly describe the improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges <br />that will be required to accommodate the planned use(s): <br /> <br />Are these improvements included in a Capital Improvements Program? <br />DYes. . briefly describe who will pay for improvements <br /> <br />~ No . . Please explain <br /> <br /> <br />3. Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities-either positively or negatively? <br />o No <br />~ Yes. . briefly describe: <br /> <br /> <br />4. Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing Traffic Demand <br />Management (TOM) strategies or through land use and urban design measures that encourage <br />alternatiyes to single occupancy vehicles (SOV)? <br />~No <br />DYes. . please describe (e.g., park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses) <br />