Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Cunningham to accept the consent <br />agenda with item 5(a) Qwest continued and with item 6(e), Meritex Enterprises, as a <br />withdrawn request. <br /> <br />Ayes: Rhody, Olson, Cunningham, Mulder Wilke <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />(6a) Planning File 3305: Prokop request to rezone and receive applicable <br />variances allowing an existing five-unit multiple family building at 2180 <br />Haddington Road. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to <br />provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated May 9, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the Prokop request to improve the site and improve <br />the interior structure. It has five units and is not conforming to an R-2 zone. The <br />structure was built in the 1940's. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained that this site was one of the sites where the zoning and <br />comprehensive plan are not consistent. By changing from R-2 to R-3A, the <br />zoning and comprehensive plan are consistent, but a 9-foot side yard setback <br />variance is needed. No more than six units could be constructed on the 15,000 s.f. <br />site. <br /> <br />Staff recommended the rezoning and the variance with three conditions: <br /> <br />1) The applicant/property owner agrees to complete a unit by unit <br />inspection with the fire and building inspector; <br />2) The applicant/property owner agrees to provide a staged five-year <br />code improvement completion plan for approval by the Fire Marshall <br />and the Code Coordinator; and <br />3) Prior to the expansion of the existing principal structure or <br />construction of an accessory structure or paving, the applicant/property <br />owner must provide the Community Development Department with a <br />scaled property survey illustrating all property lines, buildings, paving <br />and setback dimensions. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody explained that the applicant cannot expand to more than six units <br />except through notification, rezoning hearings and Council approval. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked about the size of the garage. (The accessory building <br />code applies only to R-1 and R-2). <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if a condition could be attached which would require the <br />garage to conform to an R-1 or R-2 garage size. Why did the request not come <br /> <br />Page 2 of II <br />