Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4.6 The following chart identify the Code infractions: <br /> Code Requirement Existing Proposed Variance <br /> Condition Condition N ecessa <br />Side Yard Setback 5 foot 1 foot 1 foot 4 foot <br />Overall Area 1,140 s . ft. 1,834 s . ft. 1,834 s . ft. 694 s . ft <br />Detached Accessory <br />Buildin Size Limit 1,057 s . ft. 1,234 s . ft. 1,234 s . ft. 177 s . ft. <br />Increased Maximum <br />Size 1,234 s . ft. 1,234 s . ft. 226 s . ft. <br />Maximum Total <br />Surface Area 30% or 5,432 sq. ft. 5,546 sq. ft. 5,546 sq. ft. 114 sq. ft. <br /> <br />5.0 POLICY & FISCAL IMPLICATION <br /> <br />5.1 None. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF FINDINGS <br /> <br />6.1 Because of the lack of information, the Staff is unable to thoroughly consider the <br />ramifications of replacing the small accessory building. <br /> <br />6.2 Without further information from the applicant, the Staff is not able to determine whether <br />there are unique circumstances or hardships present to warrant granting the identified <br />vanances. <br /> <br />7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />7.1 Based on the findings indicated in Section 6, Staff recommends that the request by Mr. <br />Telstad for variances to Section 1004.01A3 (Detached Accessory Building Size Limit), <br />1004.01A4 (Requirements for Increasing Maximum Size), 1004.01A5 (Overall Area), <br />1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area), and 1004.01A8 (Minimum Setbacks) of the <br />Roseville City Code be denied. <br /> <br />8.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />8.1 By motion, recommend denial request by James Telstad for variances to Section <br />1004.01A3 (Detached Accessory Building Size Limit), 1004.01A4 (Requirements for <br />Increasing Maximum Size), 1004.01A5 (Overall Area), 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total <br />Surface Area), and 1004.01A8 (Minimum Setbacks) of the Roseville City Code, subject <br />to the findings in Section 6 of the project report dated June 13,2001. <br /> <br />PF3315 RPCA (061301) - Page 3 of 4 <br />