My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03313
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2007 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3313
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Date Final City Council Action
5/14/2001
Planning Files - Resolution #
9887
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4) meet the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and support the Local Housing <br />Incentives Program for that purpose. <br /> <br />4.0 Fiscal Impact <br /> <br />4.1 Each F AHP property would become non-homestead and tax exempt due to its ownership <br />by a public entity. In consideration of this, the Metro Council will agree to make <br />payments in lieu of taxes (pilot) at a rate of 10 percent of the gross rent charged. <br /> <br />4.2 As an example, a unit that is renting to a family who qualifies under the 30 percent of <br />median income would pay an estimated $350 - $400 in monthly rent or $4,200 per year. <br />The pilot contribution would be $420 distributed among the taxing jurisdictions at the <br />same rate of regular property taxes. <br /> <br />4.3 Although analysis has not been done specifically for Roseville, a Met Council analysis <br />for another suburban community determined that in a worse case scenario if no rent was <br />charged the tax revenue lost for the purchase of 20 units was equal to less than 2 tenths of <br />I percent. <br /> <br />4.4 The pilot is calculated on the rent that is charged not collected. Therefore, if a tenant <br />does not pay the rent it does not affect the pilot contribution by the Met Council. <br /> <br />5.0 Staff recommendation <br /> <br />5.1 Based upon the city's goals to meet the affordable housing needs in the community, to <br />provide a balance of life cycle housing by attracting new families with children, to <br />provide a mix of housing types and to renovate exiting homes, staff is recommending the <br />support of 15 F AHP units in Roseville. <br /> <br />5.2 To help understand the current make up of the homestead and non-homestead unit <br />concentration in Roseville and ensure that there is a balance of housing, staff prepared a <br />map and chart showing the distribution of single family detached, single family attached <br />(includes double dwellings, duplex, triples and townhomes) and multifamily <br />condominiums throughout the entire City by Planning District. A summary of the <br />finding include the following: <br /> <br />. Total properties citywide: 95 % homestead, 5 % non-homestead. <br />. Total single family detached: 97 % homestead, 3 % non-homestead <br />. Total single family attached: 86% homestead, 14 % non-homestead <br />. Total condominiums: 81 % homestead, 19 % non-homestead <br /> <br />5.3 There does not seem to be any particular planning district with a large concentration of <br />non-homestead ownership properties with the exception of District 12. This is primarily <br />due to the large concentration of non-homestead condominiums between County Road B <br />and Hwy. 36. <br /> <br />Met Council Family Affordable Housing Program - Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.