Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dennis Welsch <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />May 17,2002 <br /> <br />Long- Term Health Effects <br /> <br />While the EPA study presented specific pollutants and pollutant concentrations in the air <br />emission from a typical crematory facility, it did not evaluate the health effects of these <br />emissions. Information regarding potential health effects was provided by Ms. Jackson of the <br />MPCA; Ms. Jackson's work involved three primary objectives: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Using the specific air emissions presented in the EP A Study for each pollutant, potential <br />exposure concentrations at the worst-case location and in the vicinity of McCarron Lake <br />were determined by using SCREEN3, which is one of the EPA's air dispersion models. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After the potential exposure concentrations for each pollutant were determined, the short- <br />tenn and 10nR-term health effects ot'inhalation of each contaminant at its respective <br />concentration were evaluated. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A highly conservative estimate of the potential effects ofmercllrv emissions on a nearbv <br />drinkinR sllpplv was also prepared by the MPCA. <br /> <br />The inhalation toxicity evaluation reviewed the risks of acute, chronic, and carcinogenic <br />exposure. This evaluation was performed by comparing the specific concentrations to Health <br />Risk Values (HRVs) established by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and the <br />California EP A. Comparison with MDH and California EP A threshold values is relevant <br />because these values have undergone a broad peer review and contain the most recent <br />toxicological information available. The following standard assumptions were made by the <br />MPCA: For acute health effects, the exposure duration was one hour. For chronic health effects, <br />the exposure frequency was 365 days per year for 70 years. For carcinogenic health effects, <br />"there is no dose that is not associated with risk", so the MPCA uses a risk assessment policy <br />developed by the MDH stating that, generally speaking, if the excess lifetime cancer risk does not <br />exceed one in 100,000, the risk is considered negligible. <br /> <br />The results of the MPCA's modeling and health-risk evaluation indicated that, based upon the <br />review of the potential acute, chronic, and carcinogenic effects of the specific emissions from the <br />proposed crematory facility, appropriate risk factors were not exceeded and no further review of <br />inhalation effects was necessarv. Detailed information regarding the MPCA's air dispersion <br />modeling and health risk assessment is located in the MPCA' s Air Toxics Review (A TR) Guide, <br />located at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/pubs/airtoxicsguide. pdt. <br /> <br />Mercury emissions were included in the EPA Study and in the MPCA's inhalation assessment <br />previously discussed; however, to address concerns of citizens regarding the potential impact on <br />the City's drinking water supply, Ms. Jackson prepared an additional letter on August 10,2001. <br />The letter presents calculations indicating that, if 2,190 cremations are performed and every <br />