Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~.l <br />n' <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />Emission Test Report <br />EMC W A-2-08 <br />Section 4 <br />Revision: 0 <br />Date: September 30, 1999 <br />Page 70f9 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />Fl <br /> <br />4.1.9 Visible Emissions Determination <br /> <br />All visible emissions readings were perfonned using EP A Method 9 procedures <br />contained in USEP A 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. Appendix E of this report contains the raw <br />field data for the tests. <br /> <br />--1 <br />U <br /> <br />Evaluations of visible emissions from the crematorium stack were made by an <br />observer who was certified in accordance with Section 3.12.1, Subsection 1.3 of the <br />, Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurements Systems: Volume III (EPA- <br />600/4-77-027b, August 1977). Appendix E contains the observer's certification. <br /> <br />~'''J <br /> <br />....,~'.J <br /> <br />r:l <br />;,,{ <br />,~J <br /> <br />The observer stood at a distance that provided a clear view of the emissions with the <br />sun oriented in the 1400 sector to his back. In addition, the observer made observations <br />from a position at which the line of vision was approximately perpendicular to the plume <br />direction. For more detailed infonnation on the observer position, see Appendix E. <br /> <br />[.1 <br />. , <br />~.JJ <br /> <br />Opacity observations were made at the point of greatest opacity in the portion of the <br />plume where condensed water vapor was not present. Opacity was read at 15-sec intervals, <br />and readings were made to the nearest 5% opaCity with a minimum of '24 observations <br />being recorded. Readings were taken against a clearly visible background which gave the <br />highest degree of contrast. See Appendix E for more detailed infonnation on the <br />observations. <br /> <br />~-l <br /> <br />" .J <br /> <br />q <br />l.j <br /> <br />4.2 Analytical Procedures <br /> <br />r'l <br />LJ <br /> <br />rl <br />I, ! <br />~.. <br /> <br />The analytical methodology and procedures used by MRI for this project were <br />standardized methods and EP A approved procedures. The analytical methods used on this <br />project are described below. The MRI SOPs pertaining to the methods are cited. <br /> <br />''') <br />J <br /> <br />4.2.1 Analysis for PCDDs and PCDFs <br /> <br />q <br />I, f <br />:__J <br /> <br />The sample components recovered from the Method 23 trains (i.e., XAD-2 resin and <br />filter) were combined and extracted in the laboratory using Soxhlet extraction according to <br />MRI SOP CS154. The procedure for extraction involved placing the XAD-2 resin and <br />filter samples in the Soxhlet apparatus, spiking with 13C12 PCDDIPCDF internal <br />quantitation standards, and extracting with toluene for a minimum of 16 hours. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />i 1 <br />, I <br />~_J <br /> <br />The train rinses were extracted with methylene chloride using a separatory funnel. <br />Following extraction, the methylene chloride was concentrated to a volume of 1 to 5 mL <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />MRI.AED\R49S 1-08-03 S4.wpd <br />