My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03315
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2007 12:15:24 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:24:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3315
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
803 LARPENTEUR AVE W
Applicant
Roselawn Cemetery
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
8/27/2001
Planning Files - Resolution #
9927
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Mercury is being deposited from the air to the Minnesota surface at a rate of 12.7 <br />ug/m2/year.3 In order to estimate increases in the deposition rate of mercury from the <br />operation of a crematory, the following inputs are used: the resulting ambi~nt <br />concentration of mercury (from SCREEN3 modeling), the velocity of mercury deposition <br />(:fi:om Pratt et.al1996t, and the amount of mercury that is in the form that will deposit <br />(from attachment 1). <br /> <br />This calculation is shown in attachment 5, and was done for two scenarios: if2190 <br />cremations were conducted in a year (8760 hours per year/4 hours per cremation), and if <br />300 cremations per year were conducted. <br /> <br />Mercury (Rg) deposition to McCarron Lake is estimated to increase three-fold assuming <br />2190 cremations were performed each year. If300 cremations were to be conducted, the <br />increased deposition is calculated to be 3 ug/m2/year, or an increase of about 23%. <br /> <br />Because the proposed crematories are new air emission sources, increased mercury in the <br />environment is expected. The estimates made here in the memorandum have been <br />conducted using a conservative screening dispersion model; refmed modeling would <br />likely lower these estimates. <br /> <br />Remedies to low mercury releases are not simple. Because few crematories in the United <br />States use add-on air pollution control equipment, control of mercury at these facilities is <br />undeveloped in the United States. For example, EP A's testing of a crematory that had a <br />wet scrubber that was thought to be a well-controlled unit showed that it was ineffective <br />at controlling pollution; particulate matter control was 0%, mercury emissions control <br />was inconsistent (sometimes 0%, sometimes 50%). Mortuary Science staff at the MDR <br />are adamant that society will not tolerate teeth removal. <br /> <br />Impacts on underground water reservoirs <br />I am in the process of discussing with staff from St. Paul Region Water Services about <br />citizens' concerns on the treated water in the reservoir northeast of Rosel awn Cemetery. <br />Citizens expressed their concern as the "respiration" of air through the reservoir as the <br />water level rises and falls. <br /> <br />Attachment 1: Emission Test Evaluation of a Crematory at Woodlawn Cemetery in the <br />Bronx, NY. September 1999. <br />Attachment 2: SCREEN3 Modeling Output: Crematory Run 4. <br />Attachment 3: Estimated Potential to Emit of Pollutants from a Crematory <br />Attachment 4: Estimated Ambient Air Concentrations from a Crematory <br />Attachment 5: Calculation of Mercury Deposition Rate over McCarron Lake, Roseville <br /> <br />3 Swain et. al. Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental North America. Science <br />257: 784-787. <br /> <br />4 Pratt et. al. 1996. Estimation of dry deposition of inorganics using fUter pack data and inferred deposition <br />veolcity. Environmental Science and Technology; 30:2168-2177). <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.