Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The North 164.0 feet of the East 325. o feet except the south 3.0feet of the West 78 <br />feet thereofofLot 12, Copes Subdivision of Lot 1 of Copes Subdivision of the <br />Southeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 29, Range 23; Ramsey County, <br />Minnesota; According to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the <br />Register of Deeds of said County and State. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D requires a 30 front yard setback for all principle <br />structures; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the 8 foot wide, by 19 feet long, stairwell would be located 8 feet into the <br />required 30 foot rear yard setback (with a remaining setback of22' to the north property line); <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in order to meet state and city building and life safety codes the fire station <br />is required to have a second stair well and the Fire Department has demonstrated the need for <br />dormitory capacity on the second level of the Station; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City and Fire staffhave determined that no other side of the building <br />meets the code for separation <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission, based on <br />findings as indicated in the June 13,2001 project report hereby recommends, to the City <br />Council, approval of the request, by the Roseville Fire Department, for an eight foot comer side <br />yard setback variance ITom Section 1004.02D5 subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />A.The added stair well shall be of similar material and matching and/or <br />complimentary colors to the existing exterior of the building. <br /> <br />B. The proposed principal structure shall be set back a minimum of 22 feet from the <br />north property line (Lovell Avenue right-of-way). <br /> <br />C. The City must provide a landscape planting plan for the addition. <br /> <br />D. All roof drainage created by the new structure must be collected in gutters and <br />channeled to the natural drainage way within the applicant's property. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br />Maschka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Goedeke, Mastel, <br />Klausing, Maschka and Kysylyczyn <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />