Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.8 Staff has further concluded that an accessory structure 1008 square feet in size eliminates <br />the need for a second structure (garden shed or larger). <br /> <br />3.9 The proposed accessory structure and its placement on the lot reduce the amount of <br />pavement (impervious area) necessary for access and use. <br /> <br />3.10 A single structure allows better control of roof runoff via gutters and the impact rainwater <br />has on adjacent properties. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF VARIANCE FINDINGS <br /> <br />4.1 Section 10 13.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to <br />demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br /> <br />4.2 A variance may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />4.3 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the <br />property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br /> <br />4.4 In review of this request, staff has concluded that an alternative proposal would be in the <br />best interest of the City and the adjacent owners. Staff considered the potential impacts <br />of the request, the potential precedent it would set, fairness to a property owner, ways to <br />compromise, and neighborhood support of the request. <br /> <br />4.5 The proposal seeks the previously supported variance and conditional use permit for a <br />1,008 square foot detached accessory building and an additional variance allowing an <br />accessory structure to be larger than the principal structure. <br /> <br />4.6 Given the current conditions, the Boucher's could construct an 832 square feet detached <br />accessory building and a 120 square foot garden shed, for a total of952 square feet. The <br />proposal seeks to eliminate the allowance for a garden shed and include an additional 176 <br />square feet of area onto the maximum allowance by City Code (832 sq. ft.) to create a <br />1,008 square foot detached (garage) accessory building. <br /> <br />4.7 Staff has determined that the total difference from the parcel's allowance (952 sq. ft.) and <br />the Boucher proposal (1,008 sq. ft.) is 56 square feet. <br /> <br />PF3325 RPCA (080801).doc Page 3 of5 <br />