pf_03329 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~"~ GcO J:-.:.C.E.3 c<&~ .- ...~J tP h? ~ ' . ..... ",,~':::\J2.\J :1t\Q,\A4e ,.i...<<- . ...... ~..""""",,''''''.. J\....~~.".-~.~; "."':'~'iW"""-J.. .". ~~ f. '-;;"c:.~~ ~ \t"'t)\~~ .r:"-~" tlC(c.JA~'J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIONlljillYlri,;\...t-> \D~. DATE: 10/14/02 ITEM NO:VIII B Agenda Section: REPORTS Administrative review of Kathleen Agness (Schorn Realty) Interim Use Permit on property located at 2256 Lexington Avenue (PF3329) 1.0 REQUESTED ACTION 1.1 When Kathleen Agness requested an Interim Use Permit (City Code SectionI012.09) on the property located at 2256 Lexington Ave to establish a realty and mortgage office, the Council adopted Resolution 9941 (September 24, 2001) which states that an annual administrative review be done and reported to the Planning Commission and City Council. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Kathleen Agness is legally operating an interim use office which includes Schorn Realty and River Valley Mortgage, at 2256 Lexington Avenue in a residential building formerly known as the Rymer Music Academy and formerly a single family home within an "R-I" Single Family zoning district. (To this date the zoning remains "R-l"; the Comprehensive Plan remains "LDR" Low Density Residential. ) 2.2 One of the purposes of the Interim Use Permit is preserve the character of the original residential architecture and site improvements and the compatibility with the existing neighborhood. No exterior remodeling has been necessary. 2.3 The Council determined that the proposed office within a residential structure was an interim use. The conditions under which it would be operated would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 2.4 Section 1012.09B states: The City Council may attach conditions to interim use permits. In reviewing interim use permit applications, the City will establish a specific date or event that will terminate the use on the property. The Council will also determine that the approval of the interim use would not result in adverse effects on the public health, safety and general welfare, and that it will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. Agness/Schorn !UP Review, PF 3329 RCA (101402) Page 1