Laserfiche WebLink
<br />without a permit and not in accordance with the City Code. One of the office occupants also <br />called asking for details of how to obtain a permit to pave the front yard for parking. The staff <br />also received phone calls asking how the office had been approved on that site. Staff informed <br />the owners that the use was not permitted within the current zoning classifications. At that time <br />the owners chose to apply for a comprehensive plan and zoning amendment that would allow <br />their real estate office use. The owners invited neighbors in on June 20th to explain their <br />situation. In August, after the hearing was continued, the staff suggested another alternative - the <br />Interim Use Permit. <br /> <br />3.0 PROJECT REVIEW <br /> <br />3.1 Ms. Agness has completed interior repainting and refinishing but no major renovation, only <br />changing the music practice and recital room uses to real estate and mortgage offices and meeting <br />spaces. No interior plans are necessary for this application. <br /> <br />3.2 As currently configured, no exterior construction or expansion outside of the existing building <br />walls is proposed. No changes are proposed to the parking lot. The light on the real estate sign <br />has been disconnected since the August meeting, based on neighbor concerns. The lawn has been <br />cut and fertilized and the shrubs were trimmed; new landscaping was added to the front of the <br />building. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF COMMENTS/FINDINGS <br /> <br />4.1 The Agness current use and proposal is inconsistent and an illegal use in an R-1 zone and <br />changes are required if the real estate and mortgage office are to remain on the site. <br /> <br />4.2 After review with the City Attorney, staff has determined that two options exist which would <br />allow the real estate and mortgage office to remain in the building. One is rezoning the property <br />to a zoning designation and changing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which is necessary to <br />appropriately deal with the office uses. A second option is a renewable Interim Use Permit that <br />allows the office (but nothing else) to remain for up to five years, then to request a renewal of the <br />interim use of an additional five years. <br /> <br />4.3 If the zoning change is sought, the zoning designation that best suits the current use ofthe <br />property and its proposed use as an office facility is the B-1 zone, Limited Business. The <br />Comprehensive Plan designation best suited for the proposal on this site is "B" Business, if the <br />City were to approve changes. <br /> <br />4.4 If an Interim Use is sought, the zoning and comprehensive plan remain the same and a permit is <br />issued only for the real estate office and mortgage company, with site conditions and for a <br />duration of five years. The applicant can seek to renew the permit for additional five year periods. <br /> <br />4.5 Ifthe change in zoning from R-1 to B-1 occurs, staff has reviewed setbacks and other related <br />zoning issues and concluded that the building appears to meets setbacks for a B-1 zone (no as- <br />built survey is available). However, the 10 foot screened buffer and landscaping are insufficient <br />adjacent to south side and rear (east) residences. Because this is a pre-existing use and no <br />additional construction is proposed, this buffer could be partially attained through fencing and <br />landscaping. The pavement setback along the south side was given a 6 foot variance to allow the <br />driveway to set within 4 feet of the south property line. <br /> <br />PF3329 RPCA (091201) Page 2 <br />