Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Heward Dahl gren <br />August 25. 19&9 <br />Page Tlllo <br />Cammo No. 89-01-1005-D1 <br /> <br />In eC1r.sideratiG!1 of tile overhead e1ectrkal trans;r,iss ion line run:;ing along <br />fernwood. the trees new proposed are !'\!!Iur Maple ",hie!': are morE:' of a ~c!)riltive <br />tree a:1d 1Ifill ~ro'" to a ~:"\xim,um heigtt of aflproximately IS'. In looking for <br />unifQrmity of plant w4terials. ~ll deciduous trees on site ~ill he ~ur Maple. <br />The net result. of this change is a doubling ir. the nunbe!" of deciduocs trees <br />being planted. <br /> <br />Sae lighting will an ~ replaced by twin 400 watt high-pressure sod;um fix- <br />cures. The fixtu;-e proposed is ident ieal tc the one iJsed at Rcsedale Square <br />(B)'erly's). <br /> <br />The revised pylo~ sigo Gesign includes a separate sign for the theatre. 80 sq. <br />ft. with a reade" bGilrd for four separate lnO\'ies. He curreot pylon sign is <br />373 sQ. ft. tot;:1 (Theiitre :;: leO, Craft Vil !age :: 78. Rainbcw z- 115) and <br />I1!eCisures 39.5' in height and is the result of a variance. :urrent city ordi- <br />nalnc:es wou1d 3110w this site to have three 3S' pylo)n signs each at 230 sq. ft. <br />The proj>osed single pylor. ~.gn is 35' in heignt and 280 sq. ft. in at"i!a <br />(~ainbc~iCrift ~ill~ge - 200. Theatre ~ SO.; <br /> <br />With regard tQ screening existins k!e(.hdh'iciJ! equlpll!ent. Sheet .&-4 bas been pro- <br />v~ded and illustrates the worst ~otldit ion a: t~ nc.rthwest cor~r of ,the pro- <br />perty. Utloer-standing that th!:! exist~f'ig ~uildin9 is approxilll.Jte1y 30 J'eus old <br />and WdS not built witl! L~ highest qialHy staf)dards ill mind and the fact that <br />the Uniform Suilning Code has m:,cn more strlng~r:t standards to date with reg'Ud <br />to snow loading any scre~nif!9 of existing mechanic.)', equipment would require <br />conside,.abl~ stru~tural ~dificatior.s as determined by Dennis Nelson of Ne1son- <br />Rudie & Asso~iates. Inc. Prelimirrary estimates for a complete s~reening of all <br />mechanical eluipment wou1d require that 4~ of tite roof be restructured. <br />Understanding that any restructurir,g to the existing ro~f condition would <br />require the closing of businesses and the lQSS of rey~,ue for a considerable <br />length of time due to the fact that the restructuring is labor inte!!s1ve. <br />Noting that tt.~ existing equipment is rather large and newer equipment with the <br />SiJr.e capabnitie:. is considerably more c;)IIIpact, so if and when mect!anical <br />equipmer.t 1S being repl~:ed. con~ider~tion will he given to its size and to its <br />finish (pai~ted to ....atcr. the roof coping.) <br /> <br />The modificatio!l5 set forth above have beEi'I designed acc('rding to several <br />import.}nt development objectives Nhlch. when 1:3I1p1eted. will provide ar. <br />aesthetic visual identity with ~pecia! emphasis on a uniform ap~ar~nc~ thrOUgh <br />buil~ing design, materia1s and site dh-en1ties. We respectively request <br />~r~ro"a1 :'or SpeCial t'Sf: Permit. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />SUNSKY KRANK E~ICKSQN ARCHITECTS, It~. <br /> <br /> <br />Ja al.~ <br />Project Architect <br /> <br />skt <br /> <br /> <br />LC: Denflis Crowe <br />Ron Krank <br /> <br /> <br />