My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02359
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:30:27 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 12:48:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2359
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2770 FAIRVIEW AVE N
Applicant
HERGG, JEFFREY
Status
Denied
PIN
042923420036
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />14 August 1991 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2359 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Jeffrey Hegg, <br />Welsh Companies <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />2770 Fairview Ave. N. <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Sign variance <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The applicant manages a multi~tenant building and wishes <br />to clean up the existing signage by constructing a new <br />ground sign with all tenants names on it to replace the <br />existing mix of signs on the site. <br /> <br />The proposed sign is 6'-6" high and 11' wide, for a total <br />of 71.5 square feet. It would be placed at a 20' setback <br />from the right-of-way. The Code allows ground signs to be <br />8' high, up to 50 square feet, and setback 20' in the 1-2 <br />district. The variance request is to exceed the size <br />provision by 43%. The height and setback meet Code. <br /> <br />The applicant's sign manufacturer has included a letter <br />arguing for the variance because of minimum letter size <br />and visibility considerations, and the desire to fit all <br />eight tenants' names on the sign. (Note: the letter states <br />the sign would be 11' high; this is incorrect, the actual <br />height requested is 6'-6", as shown on the drawing). <br /> <br />2. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />While we understand the desire of the applicant <br />advertise all tenants in the most visible way, we do <br />believe there is a hardship associated with the site <br />would prevent the applicant from constructing a sign <br />meets the size standards in the Code. <br /> <br />to <br />not <br />that <br />that <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />We recommend denial of the request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.