Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,- ('-~OOV <br />r- R /.. r: i . I <br />\ .\k = ..... I <br />V.\.. " <br />· . -t,..\O....~ <br />-- , - .r ~ I' <br />':(......p ~ )~~( li.~.'). , <br />Brooklyn Center. The use of endowments and entrance 'fees has caused resistance <br />among potential tenants and is used less often today. In fact, St Therese Southwest <br />(in Hopkins) dropped entry fees altogether after experiencing very poor leasing and <br />the Boulevard has instituted an option without endowment that requires higher <br />monthly rents. <br /> <br />The most recent trends in senior housing are the appearance of two housing types at <br />opposite ends of the service-provision spectrum. One is housing geared to. a very <br />young, independent senior, some who may still be' employed full-time. These projects <br />are more competitive with general occupancy apartments than senior developments <br />geared to the frail elderly. An example of this type of senior housing in the study <br />area is Golden Pond in New Brighton. <br /> <br />The other type of housing which is appearing more frequently is assisted living proj- <br />ects. Because these are not true independent-living developments, they ate not con- <br />sidered in this study. Many services are built into the rent, such as two or three <br />meals per day, housekeeping and assistance with bathing or dressing. Most do not <br />have full kitchens in the units. While these projects have very high monthly fees, they <br />are usually less expensive than nursing homes and provide a more residential atmo- <br />sphere. Roseville Estate in Roseville is an example of this type of project. Some <br />congregate senior projects have areas set aside for assisted living, such as North Ridge <br />in New Hope or Walker Plaza in Anoka. <br /> <br />Study Area Apartment Absorption <br /> <br />Table 12 shows the number of units absorbed in both senior and general occupancy <br />market rate projects built since 1985. This data gives an indication of the strength of <br />the market for new market-rate rental units in the study area. <br /> <br />The table shows that for both senior and general occupancy projects, absorption re- <br />flects product availability; that is, the more units that became available in a given <br />year the higher the level of absorption. Senior housing absorption peaked in 1989 (at <br />207 units) when Brightondale was still in initial lease-up and Autumn Woods and <br />Golden Pond came on-line. From 1986 through 1991, 466 senior units were absorbed <br />or an average of 78 per year. little additional absorption has occurred in 1992 since <br />all projects in the study area are full. There is just one unit currently vacant in the <br />newer senior projects, a vacancy rate of 02 percent All of the other senior projects <br />built since 1985 are 100 percent occupied. <br /> <br />Newer general occupancy projects have also experienced very strong absorption. One <br />possible housing concept for the proposed project is a building oriented to younger, <br />independent seniors. Some of. these seniors who consider a proposed Roseville senior <br />project will cross-shop these newer buildings. From 1985 through 1991, an average of <br />143 units annually have been absorbed in the Study Area. As with senior projects, <br />absorption levels have paralleled product availability. With only 14 units remaining to <br />be leased, there is a shortage of new general occupancy units in the study area at this <br />time. <br /> <br />31 <br />