My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:35:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 6,2014 <br /> Page 19 <br /> resident surveys as a priority; but expressed concern that it often reduced home- <br /> owner frontage that they had become used to as their own, even though it may be <br /> City right-of-way. In this case, Councilmember McGehee stated that she would <br /> not support the motion, opining there was a hardship due to the driveway slope <br /> and additional snow removal; further opining that an adjustment should be made, <br /> but not through use of MSA funding. Going forward, Councilmember McGehee <br /> suggested replacement of private property or amenities exactly as found. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with Councilmembers McGehee and Willmus <br /> that a good policy and practice moving forward would be to replace what was re- <br /> moved on private property. Councilmember Laliberte noted that she had also re- <br /> quested the question be divided when the sidewalk was originally proposed, as <br /> she found it to be a duplication of what was already available on the north Shore- <br /> view side of the road, and while residents were also not generally supportive of a <br /> sidewalk even though it was not part of the assessments, she thought it rubbed salt <br /> in the wound (Shoreview). <br /> From his perspective, Mayor Roe agreed with the comments of Councilmembers <br /> Laliberte and Etten specific to setting precedent; opining that it was difficult to <br /> deal with issues at the City Council meeting. However, Mayor Roe noted that a <br /> process had been set forth and undertaken for these two property owners to seek <br /> recourse. On a personal note, Mayor Roe noted that his driveway was steeper <br /> than either of those two parcels, although he had a western versus northern expo- <br /> sure creating less of a problem with snow and ice. However, Mayor Roe agreed <br /> with the need to treat like properties the same and not set a precedent that was in- <br /> consistent with past practice. Mayor Roe further agreed with the use of MSA dol- <br /> lars for construction of MSA standard roads, which in this case he noted had been <br /> used to cover costs over and above City design requirements, which from his per- <br /> spective addressed the use of MSA dollars for this project. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee and Willmus. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mayor Roe duly noted the mentioned policy matters related to driveway recon- <br /> struction for inclusion in future discussions. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:07 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:14 p.m. <br /> 13. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> a. Approve 2015 Benefit Renewals & City Contribution <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.