My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01117
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
pf_01117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:32:02 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 3:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1117
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
2660 SNELLING AVE N
Applicant
FINE ASSOCIATES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CASE NUMBER: <br />June 7. 1978 <br /> <br />tf-. <br /> <br />.!- - <br /> <br />Page Three <br /> <br />occurred on the same evening, the neighborhood people were only aware that <br />the home office site might be a possibility. We feel that the use of this <br />land for a corporate home office location provides an excellent solution <br />to the use of the bulk of the remainder of the land and will provide an <br />excellent means for a successful transition in land use that will be very <br />compatible to the single family nei9hborhood to the east of Pascal Avenue. <br />Site planning for this development, which we understand will begin <br />immediately. will, of course, stress the aesthetic relationship to the <br />ponding area in the northeast part of the property, the careful handling <br />of parking and access and egress, and provision for a well landscaped, bermed, <br />transition strip along Pascal Avenue to protect the residential area to the <br />east. <br /> <br />3. With the committments to Toy City and the Com-Ten people, there remains a <br />proposed 1.77 acre site for a restaurant in the far northwest corner of. <br />the tract and a slightly larger tract west of the service road,. and north <br />of County Road C for which no specific use is proposed at this time. <br /> <br />4. The applicants are requesting rezoning of the Toy City tract only at this <br />point, leaving the rest of the zone intact until specific developments <br />are proposed for each site. They are requesting approval of the preliminary <br />plat, including the 15 acre site for Com-Ten at this time. Also requested <br />is approval of the site plan for the Toy City development as required in the <br />8-18 District. We have examined this site plan and find it to be very <br />acceptable as adjusted. Large scale copies of the site plans, landscape <br />design, and buildings will be presented by the applicant at the hearings. . <br /> <br />5. The Toy City people are requesting a variance to the size of the pylon sign <br />allowed for their site. The 8-18 Zone allows a 70 square foot pylon sign <br />25 feet high. This restrictive sign size was adopted in the B-18 District <br />for use in the 8-18 District north of Highway 36 because of the residential <br />development immediately across Highway 36 from that area (Old Gluek Farm 1). <br />In the case of the site in question, Toy City, the land is across Snelling <br />Avenue from the Slawik Midway Ford site which is zoned B-3. The B-2, B-3, <br />or Shopping Center District would allow a pylon sign of 175 square feet and <br />30 feet high. The applicant is requesting a sign of 174.square feet, with <br />a height of 30 feet. Under these circumst~nces, we feel this is a reasonable <br />proposal. The signs placed on the building conform to the sign ordinance <br />without any adjustment for the fact that they are set back a substantially <br />greater distance from Snelling Avenue. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />In the overall, we suggest that the proposed land uses. of which the Com-Ten <br />headquarters site is the principal ingredient will .be well adapted to the <br />site and solve for us a difficult land use problem in relationship to the <br />existing single family homes in the area. We feel the proposed land <br />division, alignment for the service road, and rezoning proposed at this <br />time are appropriate and practica.l for the developer, the City, and the <br />neighbors. It is noteworthy that the Com-Ten people are considering an <br /> <br />I.~,.J':~ _ '- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.