Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.1 'Y <br />l' <br />:> <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 8- : 4-~~ <br />- _/ <br />!TE:~ NO.: ~' _~ <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />" I <br /> <br />! ) ( 'I j 1 <br />,-,/ L'{ L/ i- <br />d <br />Item Descriqtion: <br /> <br />~anager Reviewed: <br />:~ CO!1S'E!nt <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />Gerald Scnwc- 'zt.auer request fGr <br />varianc2 Et 770 W. County Road C. <br /> <br />minor <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The Minor ~arianc~ Committee cunvened on Au~~st 3, 1989 and <br />unanimously re<,:olIU'1:ended approval of Mr. Schwartzbauer I s request fer <br />a minor variance at 770 W. County Road C, <br /> <br />Mr. Schwnrtzbauer is reque~ting a variance to allow him to install a <br />6 foot fence i.n the rear ya!'d 310ng the street 0:1 a corner lot. The <br />proposed fence would enclose an inground swimming pool. The <br />proFosed fence would be setback 1 foot instea'.i ef the required 30 <br />feet. <br /> <br /> <br />The Minor Variance COl1unittee felt that the variance is justified <br />because of the loca~ion of the pool, the poo! heating and filtering <br />equipment and the location of mature trees. The fence ...01J1d not <br />extend beyond the rear 1 ine of the tlouse and wou 1 j not pose any <br />visibility problems at ~ne interse~tion, <br /> <br />All impacted ne:ghbors suppvrt the project, <br /> <br />P.equirement: <br />Proposed: <br />Vc:.riance: <br />% Variance: <br /> <br />30 feEt <br />, f'-'ot <br />29 feet <br />97% <br /> <br />COUNCIL ACTIO~ REQUESTED: <br /> <br />notion to ap9roving/d~pying <br />Schwa .'tzbauer I s :-~quest for a <br />,~riance at 770 W. County RG~d C. <br /> <br />Ge:r<lld <br />minor <br />