pf_02017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Kenneth Reinhardt, Case No. 2G! 7 Page 3 Parks and O~en Sf,ace Since "Ill of these propertje~ are existing platted IQts, there is no land dl"lsiun and, thereflJre, no requirement for park dedication. However, there is dedication required for an additional 10 feet of right-of-way for the pruperty in 'lueslion. Mr. Reinhardt proposes to l rlicate this 10 feet, whic:, could be mad2 a condition to the approval. It .:t,ould be noted, howevel th"t when the last structure was built in 1979, for some reasor. the a..., itional 10 feet of dedication did not OCl:ur for Dale Street. It did, however, occur on the first two buildings constructed in 1963 and 1968. Thus, there remains the question as to whether or not the 10 feet that snould have been dedicated in 1979 should be dedicated at this time. Mr. Re~nhardt had not offered the dedicat!on, though we have suggested that he do so. Fire Marshal ConslJerations We understand that the Fire Marshal has reviewed these plans thocgh we have no specific report from h!:n at this time, Prior to the Planning Commission meeting, we will make sure that there are no concerns relating to this rroposed de'Jelopment. Buildinq Division The building is proposed to have handicap access simi!ar to that of the existing structure to the north, For this purpose, a ramp is constructed on the west side of tr>e structure a3 indicated on th~ attached site plans. Policy Considerations It is the City's policy to encourage the development of additional residential unit$ with a variety cf housing types available to a wide range of economic interests. Here it would appeRr that the substitutioll of an older existing single-family horne by an ll-;.;nit eopar-tment to form a part of a prev:ously p:anned complex wOllld seem to be consistent with community housinr; ,'icy. T"Qugh the community has long since out!a\....ed the use of haJf stOI~S bew;.. ~1rade, it seems in this case that building the last of the four .'tructuies t.o match the e,;isting three would ue reasonable. Likewise,' is normal public pollcy to requir.:: ~di~IJ~CdPt:J ai-co'> oluuil~ tJo:-!...:;;--'; :.:;. .:-'. t~~ '":~tb~~!<~ fr~~ th,:, ;J!''Jper~~/ lines, In this ca~e, it would seem :::rudent to allow the variance so as to connect the parking area: O'le :a ;mother, In fnct, it would be impos, ible to access this fourth si te without providing access through the other siter, The granting of the variaOlce should be subject to there being .:\ reco~ded ea~e'T1e'll for common accE'SS through these affected parking areas. Compr~hensive_!:.~an ~efe~~.!O.:: The Comprehensive Plan shows multi-family housi:'i9 consl~telil with the north and the south (also owned this property as the existing land use by !vir. Reinhardt). high density, on the iot t'J