Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />06:0'&:90 <br /> <br />Dsr. !~C, <br /> <br />IlJOll8 <br /> <br />14:fJ.& <br /> <br />tG be pr-epared by a registe!'ed architect c: engineer, exrept in <br />cases whe;:-e unusual structural methods are proposed.. <br /> <br />13.43D. Noise, Smoke. T oxic Matter. Gdors, Vibrations, Gl3r-e or Heah. <br />and EJC'":.~o:.ives. <br /> <br />(Performance Standards r-ela::;-;g to smok~ toxic m:ltter, odcI'$, <br />vibrations, glare Dr heat, and explO$iv~, should be moved ~".n the <br />industrial Section 10.270 through Section 10.230 to Uus section u:)(jer <br />P~r""mar.ce St::mdards so as to bfc 2pplicabi~ to ail zaoe~ rather than <br />tr:!? b:iustrial District only. The Ordinance as currently W!"~tten. makeS <br />these stanrli>..r:.s applicable tu the i(']fj~trial area only. Where such <br />problems usuaLy grist, t:hoIJgh they may well occur in othe;- zones as <br />well -- p'3I'ticularly business:.cnes.) <br /> <br />IV. POLICIES TO ESTABLISH TI-RES!-U..DS FOR REQUJRING SITE PLAN <br />REYJEW, (;(It.ICRETE a.RaJNG AN) ~ AN) RlGHI...cF-WA Y <br />DEDICATION <br /> <br />A. SITE PLAN REViEW <br /> <br />The PJanning Commi~c.n re;:;omm~mds that a L'4""f::'$hald of a;,ythil1g more <br />than iO pei'..:ent of an p-xpsnsion of a building or an ~xpeooitur~ equal <br />to 0.. above 2u percer.t of the assessor's market vtlue t'f tt1e j:.:"aperty <br />(land and !>eHdings) would ml::e\. a t!1reshold wherein 2 Special \J$e <br />Permit for site plan review would be ~qu!~d. A 50 percent eoxpa'1:Iion <br />:If a buildil1l.;j ao%r a sa pe..'"t:en';; incre~ of valye would require <br />1eeting all development design criteria as stipulated in the Perfcrma~ <br />:tanda..rds section of the Ordinance. A percentags of building expansion <br />beotween 10 and 5'1 percent 2nd/or 2 monetal"; imprG'/e!ilent between 20 <br />pe....-ent and 50 percent wC'u.\d require a propr.>>tloOAl level of <br />imJ'rov:ament in all design area' a.. may be proposed in a suhmission for <br />site plan review, oubje::t to revie~ by the City Planning Commission and <br />appr\)val by the Cit.y Council. <br /> <br />Such a policy sets a minimum under which nG plan review is reQUh~:'. <br />sets a maximum for full ~ompliarlce, and jet provH:es a degree cf <br />flexibility fur th,:,se areas in between, in thO! pruc-ess OT preparing the <br />applicatiol:, meet;ngs will be cor.ju~ted with t.'1e Staft who will <br />~ncour~ge the applicant to improve t."1e ;:Jroperty &nd cOf,fcrm t~ the. <br />re qt';.-ements as mUCn as may be reasonabJe. The final decision 1!S to <br />such appropriat2:Jess will be left to the Pianm ng D..; 'TImi$$ion and <br />COlJnci1. <br /> <br />B. CONCRETE CL:RsiNG ANi) DRAINAGE <br /> <br />As ~::::\J~'T)ended by Stave Gatlin in A~pf!l1dix ]: <br />Cornmi~iod recomrnur;ds ~he following set of ~rit~ria <br />whe" parking lot c'-1rbing $nd cI'ainage ;s rec;t.ill-ed. <br /> <br />the Piannirn.; <br />for considei'ing <br /> <br />1. Concrete ~t,;!'b and p,Dpe. sett>ae:ks ,viti be requi~d if the <br />parlcina lot is recraded c::' .-o.;:o~ti'l1cterl with a 2-inch lift (ur <br />great~~) of bitlll':'ii;ous ~avemE>n~. <br /> <br />