Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />06 :(i~' 90 <br /> <br />D$I:. 1:\(, <br /> <br />H;OS <br /> <br />VL SI~ ORDJNAN:E ~ <br /> <br />The Planning Commission ~ecornmend$ that the Sign OrdiOitoce be <br />amender' so CIS to allow the setback for a g1"Dund sign to be o~h:81f of <br />that required fur a pylon wherein t."Ie sign area of su.::h s sign is <br />reducect ttI one-half ~r If;~ of that which is requir.;d fot' a pylon si~. <br /> <br />The Sign Ordinaoc e st-.all also be e.me..ded to irr..lude the 5-4 District in <br />the existir>g cstegor-y for B-!., B-3, :n' SIlopping Center far purposes of <br />allocating sign stand?sos 'at waU signs ane: pylon signs. <br /> <br />vn. CONCLU~ <br /> <br /> <br />The Planning CommIssion rec-ommenas that the CmJncil ~n3ider the <br />adoptio.1 of t.ie rec::ommtndatiims caotained herein and that preceding <br />$Utm :'!doptiGI1 a 'JIOi"k session with the C:wncii may be ~t1!;ide!'ed fClc <br />purposc Jf consultation and review. It is the intent of the Commlaloo <br />~t thc-..se recommendations will $!.ibstsntiaily r-!"'Pt1Jve the level of <br />quality tJi oew cieveloprT1et'!t, ~deveiopm~nt, ar-,d in cases where <br />substantial expa~on occurs.. <br /> <br />The Planning Commi:lsion further recGmmends t.'iat options .:Ithet" than <br />those re~mmended herein ms;-' be con:.ldered toy !:.'1e Co=.soc:il where it is <br />;:.;;t that t'nnsb:-uctivs additions or r-......isicns improve t.",e overall <br />funr:?:imm) and ae1iti12dc ievel of deve!opm!:mt ir. U<e comml.o ~;ty in the <br />immedL yea.>-s fihead. <br /> <br />fl/Old <br /> <br />