My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-11-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-11-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2014 3:26:25 PM
Creation date
11/20/2014 3:01:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/25/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
261 that the unions, in their contract negotiations, had settled at a 2% increase for <br />262 2015. <br />263 <br />264 Mr. Schwartz noted that the percentage increase for costs for employee insurance <br />265 benefits had exceeded pay increases over the last 5-10 years. <br />266 <br />267 Member Cihacek sought staff s assumptions for supply costs, based on prime <br />268 inflation rates or how they determined those assumptions. <br />269 <br />270 Mr. Miller responded that, while the City uses the Consumer Price Index (CPI) <br />271 for inflation projections and assumptions, it was different when determining <br />272 supply/maintenance for the water/sewer structure from that typically used for <br />273 individuals determining increases for groceries, gas and household supplies, with <br />274 Mr. Schwartz also factoring in inflationary costs based on cost trends provided by <br />275 suppliers. Historically, Mr. Miller advised that they remained close to <br />276 inflationary costs; however, noted that they could range fro\for <br />277 depending on the type of supplies and materials needed. <br />278 <br />279 Member Cihacek asked s f for specifics for containing pr <br />280 commodities. <br />281 <br />282 Mr. Schwartz responded that t e majority of the department's expenses were <br />283 personnel or equipment related in the water/sewer utility funds, with staff <br />284 purchasing supplies, materials and equipment off state contracts for the most part <br />285 when av ble. Mr. Schwartz advised that the major driver for water/sewer rates <br />286 were for is attributed to the wholesale cost of water and treatment of sewage, <br />287 representing proximatel 80% of the rates. Mr. Schwartz advised that the City <br />288 had been experiencing hi r than general inflationary costs from the <br />289 Metropolitan Council and Saint Paul Regional Water Services, which was driving <br />290 the rates more than local osts. <br />291 <br />292 t the request of Member eigler, Mr. Miller responded that the storm water <br />293 drainage rates were being driven mostly by the age of existing infrastructure, with <br />294 most of the lines providing 50-65 years for a typical life span, and the cost to <br />295 build a sewer main is depreciated over 50 years. Mr. Miller advised that the <br />296 preferred process would be to set aside a little money over that 50 year cycle to be <br />297 available when replacement was needed. <br />298 <br />299 At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Miller advised that the replacement cycle <br />300 was now occurring with the twenty-year projected CIP; however, he clarified that <br />301 it had not been done diligently in the past, which created the rate hikes for 2015 as <br />302 shown, with depreciation averaged out, and dollars actually averaged out, but <br />303 capital spending fluctuating from year to year. <br />304 <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.