My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02042
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2000
>
pf_02042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:37:24 PM
Creation date
12/10/2004 8:53:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2042
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1524 COUNTY ROAD C2 W
Applicant
CENTENNIAL UNITED METHODIST
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />nA TE: <br /> <br />{) December 1989 <br /> <br />CAse NUM3ER: <br /> <br />20.=;2 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Centennial United Meth;)oist <br />Chu_ _:11 <br /> <br />LOCfl.TlON: <br /> <br />1524 West County Road C-2 <br />(se~ sketch) <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Variance to Zoning Ordinaflce <br />Standard Requiring Concrete <br />Curb and Gutter <br /> <br />Pl.ANoIING CONSIDERA HCX>& <br /> <br />L BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Attacherl is a copy of a narrative from Mr. Cli Hard Vi. ;'_, 3 <br />member of the Boa,d of Trustees for Centennial Unite.: .. ;:st <br />Church, that presents a summary of the background $Orrc, ,; '-:'::9 '-his <br />matter. Basically, the church has ~een located on this property for <br />over 40 years and it has been expanded in increments over this period <br />to meet the changing needs of the congregation. <br /> <br />Last sumrne,: the church undertook a numbe. of repairs and maintena~ <br />work, including the installation of a 2-inch asphalt overlay on the <br />existing parking !ot. Mr. Lund states that the chcrch was unaware that <br />this parking Jot repair requir~d a permit from the C;ly of RDsevil~e. <br />The church relied on the contractor to secure all of the nece~ary <br />permits and the contractor faiJed to do so. <br /> <br /> <br />The problem with this situation is simply that the work that was done <br />or. the parking lot, while arguably an improvement over the existing <br />conditions, does not meet current City Code requirements. Specifically, <br />the Code requires concrete curbing around the perimeter of' the parking <br />JUt. City plans aJso call for sidewalks to be instalJed along County <br />Road C-2. It is the policy in the City of Roseville (as well as most <br />other ':Or!lmunities) to require nonconforming buildings and lots to come <br />into compliance with current Coda requirement5 whe.l a new permit, or <br />other planning action, ~ ne~ded on the property. <br /> <br />Since the work has already bp.en done, the church is applying for a <br />variance to officJaJJy gain relief from the requirement. to instalJ <br />concrete curbing. As with all variance appJications, the focus of review <br />should be on the hardship that exists to justi fv this departure from the <br />strict enforcement of the Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.