Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ro:;evHJe P.oper-ties, C<lse No. 2Q46 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The applicants indicate that they art: wLr~dng h3I j to ,,~hiev€ these <br />objectives, but bec:!Use th," uriglflal architect is cHl v;:>,catiDn, they have <br />not been able to praGuee 8 des!gn solutiGn if. LiT,e for the v,riting d <br />thl: report. 1hey may, ~IOWi'Ver, have such de:igns comp;eted in time <br />to ha,ce t.hem mailed ta mE:;mbcrs of the Ph::nmng Cc;r,mission in <br />advance of the meeting. We also noted that it is important cO address <br />ail of the concerns eXiJressed at the mee~ing ir. the form of d written <br />text, as well as the 3\>propriate drawings. Ii this adoition,,: m3terial is <br />not received by Tuesday, December 26th, it wii! be ma;led under <br />separate cover to members of the P!ann:ng Commission and COUOlC:!. <br /> <br />2. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Attached is a copy of last month's report outlining t.he technir:al data <br />ana concerns. It would appear that a successful s::>iution to this design <br />and iand use problem can be achieved. The principal constraint is the <br />wi, !ingr.ess to ach.eve an appropriate and aesthetically acceptable design, <br />cor"'~rting successfully from OT.e land use to another (industr:al to <br />ShOppiilg center). <br /> <br />