Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />J....~E: <br /> <br />2 Ma)' 1990 <br /> <br />CASF: NU1.18U'<: <br /> <br />2065 <br /> <br />,\PDliC;\NT: <br /> <br />KA YO Oil Company/Wholly <br />lJwned Subsiciary of Conoco <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />Nortf1west <br />Ruad r <br />:>ketch) <br /> <br />Corner of County <br />and SOP.liing (see <br /> <br />ACTJON REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Apprl'vaJ of SoeciaJ Use <br />Permit for Exterior Dls;Jlay of <br />Merchal1dise <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDER A TlaNS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />This service station was tota!:y redevelo~ed about two years ago and <br />was done in accordance with applicable ZoniOfJ and Building Code <br />regulations. It is I)ne of the larger stations in the City and one that <br />functions w~1I on the site. Th2 applicants have sub:nitted a site plan <br />and staterrent. The statement tloes not indicate the area af the <br />buiidin", 0/ the exact area of the proposed exterior display. <br /> <br />2. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY <br /> <br />Site Area: <br />Width of Sidewalk: <br />Width of Display: <br /> <br />40,OOD Square Feet <br />Approximately 6 Feet <br />A;>proximatp.ly 3 Feet <br /> <br />3. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Planning Considerations <br /> <br />This station is well designed and has ample sid!!waP: aruund the <br />structure, as well as ample and well-placed gasoline service areas, <br />parking, and access drives. Though the specifi~ area of building and <br />storage :;Irea is "1Ot indicated in the statement. submitted, it would <br />appear that the space proposed in the site plan is reasonahle aod <br />.vorkable. You vi!! note in visiting the site (as I)f April 25) that there <br />are wooden pallets ii1 the area .vhere merchandise i~ to be displayed, <br />lhauQh no merchandise was the,'e at the time, Tf the mer::t'tandise is <br />dispia~'ed to the e>.lent of the width of thE 'i:s i3pproximatt};y 3 <br />feet), there seems to b~ adequate room for safe .~ ~age of pedestrians <br />on the sidewalk. Thu:;, it appears that the r ,sa1 as submitted, <br />sublect tQ determination of :>pecific dimensi"ns, IS appropriate and <br />coftsister,t. with the criteria. <br /> <br />4. CONCLUt'"!ON <br />--- - <br /> <br />Subject lO the condition t~at the merchandise be displayed 85 indicated <br />cn the site plan and in the attached statement (with the addition of <br />~xa~'t dimensions), the e"leriOJr displa:' ares prop{tsed aplJears to be <br />reasonable. There are 1\0 enyinet::1 ing .condition:; to be considered, <br />