Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CALIBRE RID9E PROJEC'i' <br /> <br /> <br />Dominium Grou~ and Gordie Bove are before this City Council <br />requestinq approval of the same project that was previou.sl! <br />approved unanimously in 1988. See the site plan attached as <br />Exhibit B. There are no substantive changes frOZ1 the Brutger <br />proposal to the current proposal. <br /> <br />The property is zoned R-3A and the project ~s proposed would <br />have a density of 18.34 units pel acre. 'Phis is an acceptable <br />~~r.sity per your zoning c~je and ~~ fact this project. if approved. <br />'liB have a dwellinq unit per acre density of less than a majority <br />of the multi-family developments whi~h currently exist in <br />Roscvi1:ie. See attac~.ed E~hibit C. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />Your zoninq code states that in the R-3A zoning district any <br />building over twenty-four units will require a special use perEdt. <br />If tt: developer would have chosen to build this project in three <br />separate buildings of twenty-four units each. you would have b&d to <br />issue a buildinq permit. Three twenty-four unit buildings vould be <br />a permitted use in the R-3A zoning district and when there is a <br />permitted use, a building permit !RUSt be issued. Due to cost <br />cons~raints. the developer chose to build one building of seveoty- <br />three units rather than three twenty-four unit buildiD9s. ODe <br />bui.idinC] as proposed by the developer does not in~rea~e the density <br />per acre from the three building pe~tted ure. <br /> <br />This project has the approval and rec~clatior. of your <br />staff. 'The planning cOJl'lRission has recommended granting t.he <br />developer the speclal use permdt. <br /> <br />At the public hearinq held on this matter ColD July 30. 19~,). <br />there was neighborhood opposition to the project based on their <br />perception that this project would cause traffic problems in tbe <br />neighborhood. In attempting to address those co~erns. both the <br />city and the develop~r requested that representative~ of HR DOT be <br />'Present at the bearinq. M1f DO'!" s re'Presentati yes revie"ed the <br />traffic situation and stat~a that the project as designed would be <br />approved by ~hem. They ~lso s~ated that the ~wo exits on Rice <br />street and Minnesota Street were the best design ~onfiguration for <br />the projec~ to el iminate tl'affic probl ems. The city's eUQineer <br />stated that both Minnesota Street and Rice Street have the design <br />r8~a~~t! to h~n~'~ t~~ mini~1 perc~ntaqe inc~ease in traffic that <br />will be crea~~d by this project. <br /> <br />No one frow. the neighborhood has F'!"esented any definitive <br />c.vidence excepl their opinion tha\. the projE"ct will have a necjative <br />impact on neighborhood t.raffic. The fee owner nas hired 8 <br />transportat.ion consultant, Benshoof and Associates. Inc.. who has <br />done a traffiC study for the pro~ect. Hr. Benshoof's expe~t <br /> <br />-2- <br />