Laserfiche WebLink
<br />n_~ <br />..~~:f:;l <br />-~l <br />~ <br />.~ <br />-':=:.: <br /> <br />,'. <br /> <br />J <br />'-, <br />.~ <br /> <br />for staff, I would recommend that definitive criterie.. bQ <br />formu.1.ated ......0 dr~rmine wbether a plan must indeed ratU1I <br />to the PlanniaCj COmmission and City Council for farther <br />review. In this way, the ec .meil will have establ iBhed <br />said criteria, and staff will simply review any ~ps <br />within that context. Another alternative would 9I1tai1 <br />simply bringing every project back to the 1'1Af'1)il1 <br />Commi.ssion and COUncil, thcs removing the staff from aul" <br />decision making latitude when these situations oeeur.. Z <br />would recommend the former approa:h, wbicb provides the <br />staff a degree of protection, yet doGS not immda1:e the <br />City council with every pending modification. <br /> <br />.~ <br />, .~ <br />,._~ <br />:"d: <br />;~ <br />~~ <br />,.~ <br />~ <br />. -" ---~..~ <br /> <br />._':~~ <br />, ~. <br />'-tJ! <br />.~~l <br />,~ <br /> <br />- ....; <br /> <br />.i~ <br /> <br />-;. <br />, :.;0' <br /> <br />,~ <br />_OJ <br /> <br />-~ <br />-j <br /> <br />_ '\0_' ~": <br />.~~: <br />-~~'! <br /> <br />'~ <br />'," <br />.., <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.~~ <br />~;~ <br />" .., <br />~.~ <br /> <br />i~: <br /> <br />- ~~~ <br /> <br />. . ~ . '. . . . '" .' , . '. .... ~ , . . ~- <br />. . r . . . . :-",' ,". "'''... . <br />, . <br />