pf_02113 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~'l..cr!::~r~~ i-Z[:~Ul5TC~i: kpr;..~\ai 5!1oie.i:ie of S!de S~tbac~.s. Yard and PLANNiNG REPOH T -J;\ TE_: '\\J;~5: . '::Q'- ::..:'\SE r\lLJ:'o'1G[F"<~: :>.?PUC -"NT: --.~<:;e.--'~-<...~:": ~st.::iP$ ':- ClC' ..:4. T l',-~IT'.J: :: ~~2 \';ctor<c: Street PLANNING CONSlDERA TlONS: 1. S.:\.O<GROUND T:'lS itefTl was he3rC and corlti:'iuec at th~ JlJi'. 11 '-:~':~7.i:lg. In voti!1g t8 continUE this itern, thp Pianning Comrniss!On was requesting clarification of [\'/0 question~. First and mo~t j,-nportanUy, which line sho~!ld the required setbacks be measured fro'n. ai'nor.g the many shown on the certified bourdary survey su!'"T,itted by the a;>plicanL5'. - Second, how and when did this mistake OCCui in the development process? We met with the applicant's attorney, i"lf. :";aynard and the surveyor, Gary Harr;s, during planning office ';ours on Wednescay, July lB. H.e purpose of this meebng was to visit the site and dete:-mine the appropriate line to measure the sett.",cK from 30lG trace the error to its source. '-(ou wiil recall from the previous plar'ning report ar.d the discussion at the rneeting that tn. Rose:vilIe Shoreline Ordinance requires the setback to be measured from tne poir.t c;t "" nich the vegetation changes from aqudtir. to upland species, In man,..- cases, and particularly in cases such as this where swamp iand abut~ the shoreline, the iocation of this line ....i!! move ovr'r timo. We visited the site and measured 75 feet fr'Jm the sO:.Jtheast corner of the bu:!oing. Karl I<eel hejd the er;~ of th~ tape and walked out to iocate the shorelir.P., After conducting this insp€:ction, Karl ha5 concluded that the Jine shown as of October 1988 is the title that his depart;r,ent cOf1<:iders the shoreline of record iil th,s CEse. This means that the amount of enc.roac:hmer.t identified in ;-,11'. :.1aynard's letter 0.6 fer-t at the sDuthern enrl r:=t!1pT",nr: tl""l roo'""" -:;:-;~:-::-~~~~:"','.;:;'j:' ~/- ;'Od teet to the nort,h) is accurate. The appllc<J!1ts wil! explain more comp,,~td) h::Jw this mistake occur1'~d, It is Otlr understanding that it is the reselt oi a misl<:1ke m~de b~' the ?,oject architects. -.-he sf)oreiine was shewn differently an a p!'evious!y o:ppro':ed plan, based upon a survey prepared by Georgi Sehrnidt. When the new shoreline IGcation was prC'videa to the applican~s {October 1938 survey), it came on a drawing that Just irH:luded the site boundaries and the centerline .--,f Victoria Street, The architects lir.ed the drawing up incorrectly, matchil'1g what shuuld have been t~~ centerline of Victoria Street over the right of way l: '1e. The) ihl'n assumed that there was